VBAC Myths – 4 Common Myths Busted

VBAC Myths - 4 Common Myths Busted

D

espite the fact that health organisations are warning against the rise of caesarean rates in most developed countries around the world, achieving a vaginal birth after a c-section (VBAC) can still be a challenge. Caregiver attitudes and hospital policies with regard to monitoring and labour timeframes limit women’s choices and care options when seeking to achieve a VBAC.

Twenty years ago, there was no choice – once a woman had a c-section, any future births would be caesareans. Today, this rule no longer applies.

If you’ve had one or more c-sections, as long as your pregnancy is considered low risk, you should be given the option for a VBAC. Some mothers choose to VBAC at home to avoid the restrictions they may face in a hospital setting.

Women choose to have a VBAC for a number of reasons:

  • They feel their previous c-section was unnecessary
  • Vaginal birth is something they want to experience
  • Fast and easier recovery following a vaginal birth
  • Vaginal birth has less risks for future pregnancies and births
  • A deep belief that a natural labour and birth can be part of the healing process if a previous c-section was traumatic

Despite the amount of research that has been carried out on VBAC births and the likely risks in different scenarios, there is still plenty of misinformation floating around.

If you are considering a VBAC, it’s important to do your research and understand the risks as they apply to your specific situation and medical history.

4 Common VBAC Myths: Busted

Here are 4 common myths about VBACs that simply aren’t true:

VBAC Myth #1: Uterine Rupture Is A Big Risk If I Have A VBAC

The risk of uterine rupture is often stated as a main reason against trying a natural birth after having a previous caesarean.  You can read more about what is uterine rupture here.

Uterine rupture is in fact very rare. A study in the UK in 2012 showed that overall risk of rupture was 0.2%. You are more likely to require a c-section due to other medical complications — such as cord prolapse or haemorrhage — than a uterine rupture.

Although there is an increased risk of uterine rupture due to potential weakness around the caesarean scar, this depends on the type of incision that was made and its position. According to figures from the Mayo Clinic, uterine rupture affects less than 1% of women who have had a low transverse uterine incision. This incision is standard procedure for most c-sections and involves a low side-to-side incision as opposed to a classic vertical one.

Before making an informed decision about VBAC, you should confirm the type of incision you have, and what the risks are likely to be for your specific situation.

VBAC Myth #2: You Can’t Have A VBAC If You’ve Had More Than One C-Section

Research shows that there is a no increased in risk for uterine rupture for women who have more than one c-section. This study indicates women who have had three previous caesareans have similar rates of VBAC success as those who have had one or two elective c-sections.

Again, it’s important to be informed about your specific situation, but these findings show that vaginal birth should be an option for all low risk women.

VBAC Myth #3: You Can’t Have A VBAC If You’re Pregnant With Twins

The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) issued new guidelines on VBAC that state women who are pregnant with twins should be offered the option of VBAC, as long as the previous scar was low transverse and there were no other risk factors.

According to studies in the US a twin pregnancy/birth does not have a higher risk of uterine rupture after c-section than a singleton pregnancy.  As long as the previous scar is in the right place and there are no other risk factors, giving birth to twins shouldn’t automatically disqualify you from trying a VBAC.

VBAC Myth #4: My Obstetrician Doesn’t Do VBACs, So I Can’t Have One

Hospitals and obstetricians can vary significantly in their attitude towards VBAC, so it’s worth getting a second opinion if your caregiver or hospital have restrictive policies or refuse you the option of having a VBAC. Most hospitals require there to be an anaesthetist in the building or in close proximity at all times, but this can be more difficult in smaller hospitals. Whatever you decide, make sure you do your research so you are aware of all your options.

VBAC has a number of advantages including faster recovery times, reduced medical intervention and less chance of repeat c-sections for future births. By educating yourself and understanding your options you can make the best choice for you and your baby.

VBAC Recommended Reading

Don’t forget to check out our other VBAC articles, including:

 
Last Updated: May 22, 2015

CONTRIBUTOR

Sam McCulloch enjoys talking so much about birth that she decided to become a birth educator and doula, supporting parents in making informed choices about their birth experience. In her spare time she watches Downton Abbey and has numerous creative projects on the go. She is mother to three beautiful little humans.


4 comments

  1. I am so happy to see this issue addressed. These myths have become interpreted as “law”- it is illegal to ………..you will hear a woman say. But I must point out one factual error that caught my attention. You mention 20 years ago there was no choice- all prior C.section required a repeat. However, 20 years ago VBAC had become very popular and available. “The VBAC rate increased by 29 percent, from 21.3 in 1991 to 27.5 in 1995” (CDC). It wasn’t until after 1998, and in particular ACOG’s “immediately available” requirement for OB’s that the VBAC rate began to plummet. It was actually in 1980 that VBAC became acceptable- prior to that the ole “Once a C always a C’ tenet held.

  2. hi, would you please be kind enough to share this onto my page- BirthEasy Melbourne. ( As there is no share button for this valuable article)

  3. I’ve had 2 c sections and was told by someone that it’s not recommended to give birth after 3 c sections (she said I’d most likely be having a 3rd c section). I figured I wouldnt be able to have anymore kids because of the risk and was trying to talk my boyfriend into getting a vesectomy lol. I am happy to have read this article and will be doing my research.

Leave a Reply

Please note: in order to prevent spam and inappropriate language, all comments are moderated before they appear. We appreciate your patience awaiting approval. BellyBelly receives many comments every day, and we are unable to approve them all as soon as they are posted.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

loaded font roboto