For starters, Kelly midwives receive NO training how breastfeeding during the degree. So they either learn through having breastfed themselves (or not) or through the midwifery staff they learn through. So if you have a midwife teaching a midwife that has NFI about the techniques of breastfeeding or underlying anatomy and physiology the cycle will continue to repeat itself. Secondly, as paeds or obs continue to recommend formula to LBW or premmie babies in the SCN or NICCU midwives seem to have blindly followed suit in believing that it is necessary. Rather than assisting the mother to express and teach her to express and store her milk. Again, this availability of artificial baby milk in the hospital leaves an imprint on the mothers brain, that her baby NEEDS artificial baby milk because obviously her milk was no good. It is disasterous to think this and of course isn't evidencd based. So upon discharge she walkes into the first chemist and buys the *necessary* bottle of formula. Naturally, hospitals do not cover enough breastfeeding education in the antenatal period. WHY? Because most midwives don't know how to properly attach a baby to the breast, at least they often cannot keep their hands off babies heads, they always seem to have to *help* the mother breastfeed, this has been researched to cause problems with attachment. Next, the type of maternity care a woman seeks is going to tcause a direct relationship as to the woman sucessfully breastfeeds her child for the recommended 2-5 years as stated by the WHO. Women who undergo care under an obstetrician (for example) are more likely to have unnecessary interventions, such as induction, forceps, vontouse, episotomy, augmentation, tears, traumatic birth, difficult birth, higher rates of PTS, PND, LSCS for eg.) in comparision to women who birth with a independent midwife. So why aren't govts providing medicare and insurance for midwives, the specialists in normal birth? Surgeon have access to it. For MCH nuses/midwives should be mandatory for them to become a lactation consultant, and it should be for midwives for that matter to, at least to have done breastfeeding studies. This will stop the conflicting advice and give women access to adequate prenatal breastfeeding education.
Women who choose NOT to breastfeed should have to access a lactation consultant for scripts to formula, not a doctor as a doc has a conflict of interest as a formula fed baby will be a sicker baby (again research knows this) so a doctor could be seen as looking after their own interests. Women who choose to formula feed should also have to have counselling and explore the reasons why the are choosing not to give their baby the best (normal) start to life. Sounds harsh, but in reality babies DIE from not being breastfed. This inquiry is to work out why women don't breastfeed and to fix the system that isn't working for women and babies at the moment. So lets not beat around the bush and tell them (govt) the facts. I could keep going on and on... but that is enough for now :)

