New to this with IVF questions
Hi there,
I had a Hyst & Lap performed today and found that my tubes are clear but they are adhered to my ovaries, meaning a natural BFP is unlikely. Not impossible - just really challenging.
My FP advised that IVF would be the way to go from here. My head was already spinning as I was in the recovery ward and now I just have so many questions.
I am eager to start as soon as possible but wondered if anyone could advise how long you are on the meds before you need to be going in for the blood tests and ultrasounds?
We have a holiday planned to NZ in early July which I would gladly cancel but perhaps there is no need if the monitoring hasn't begun?
Also, I am unsure how long after the hyst & lap they would wait before IVF?
I am brand new to BB so please let me know if I should be posting elsewhere!
TIA
Late AF after Lap & Hyst - Normal??
:
Hi there,
I had a Hyst & Lap performed today and found that my tubes are clear but they are adhered to my ovaries, meaning a natural BFP is unlikely. Not impossible - just really challenging.
TIA
Since my surgery 3 weeks ago today, I have still not had AF turn up. I am on day 32 and my longest cycle prior to this was 30 days - averaging 28. Is it normal for these kinds of procedures to muck up your cycle? I bled for about 4 days after the surgery from the hyst.
I have PMS - big time crankiness :pms:and lovely chin zits but nothing to match it!!!! For once I want it to turn up and be done with it. Any advice appreciated
NK Cell Test - Help with Undestanding the results
Hi,
I have a couple question regarding NK Cell test and what the results mean.
Question No 1: Total NK Cells (CD3- 56+), What percentage level is classed as normal.
On My sisters test result her level was 19.8% and they said that was classed as Very Very High levels. She requires Prednisilone and Clexane for her future IVF cycles.
Question No. 2: On my results for the NK Test there was hand writing on my test from lab regarding, Activited (CD69+) dim NK’S, does anyone know anything about this?
A lot of the NK tests do not have this information written on it as it is only done if your doctor specifically requests it and if they specialises in immunology.
Mine reads as Activited (CD69+) dim NK’S = 2-1% = 4.2 x 10 6/L
Does anyone know what percentage this should be and what percentage rate is considered as high and low.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Inanna View Post
The NK cell is the most abundant immune cell infiltrating the womb implantation site. In a previous study, an elevated percentage of peripheral blood NK cells were associated with recurrent failed IVF-ET treatment cycles. Another study showed that increased peripheral blood NK cell toxicity was associated with an increased rate of recurrent failed implantation after IVF-ET treatment. More recent studies have confirmed elevated NK cell CD69 expression as being associated with recurrent miscarriage and infertility of unknown reason.
I also found this on a UK site: But I don’t know if there tests are done differently to ours:
• The NK cell is the most abundant immune cell infiltrating the womb implantation site. In a previous study, an elevated percentage of peripheral blood NK cells were associated with recurrent failed IVF-ET treatment cycles. Another study showed that increased peripheral blood NK cell toxicity was associated with an increased rate of recurrent failed implantation after IVF-ET treatment. More recent studies have confirmed elevated NK cell CD69 expression as being associated with recurrent miscarriage and infertility of unknown aetiology. Finally, a recent small non-randomised study has also suggested elevated NK cell CD69 expression may be related to failed implantation of the embryo.
We also recently conducted a study to evaluate the effect of the absolute count of the activation marker (CD69) and inhibitor marker (CD94) expression on peripheral blood NK cells on implantation and miscarriage rates after IVF-ET treatment. It was a randomised prospective observation study of 138 randomly selected women who underwent IVF-ET treatment from December 2002 to September 2003. Our data suggests that an elevated level of CD69+ peripheral blood NK cells is a detrimental factor for implantation of embryos in IVF-ET treatment. Those women who have an elevated peripheral blood CD69+ NK cell count achieve a positive pregnancy from IVF-ET have a significantly higher risk of miscarriage. The specificity and positive predictive value of predicting IVF-ET outcome for women who have a peripheral CD69+ NK cell count above 1.0 x10 6 /L are 92.1% and 92.3% respectively. This test may therefore be used in clinical practice to predict negative outcome of IVF-ET treatment.
Any information is greatly appreciated.