Not pointing- do I really need to go back to the MCHN?
At our 12 month check up, DS was not pointing and the MCHN wasn't terribly happy about it. She said if he was still not pointing at 15 months, we needed to come back and see her. Well, its 4 days off 15 months and there are no signs of pointing.
I've done the reading on why not pointing is a concern- its about "shared attention"- the idea that your child recognises you have a different perspective/ experience than them, and they see something and want to share it with you. Not pointing or delaying pointing can at its most extreme be an autism marker and at its less extreme can signify a learning/ language delay.
In all other respects my DS is a very normal, happy, interactive child. I would be beyond astounded to learn there is anything remotely 'delayed' or different about him. He seems very bright and curious and observant and aware. There are absolutely no other signs of autism. I think he shows shared attention in other ways, but nothing so blatent as pointing.
So do I go back or not? I guess my fear is that once I go back, it starts a whole chain (kind of like the cascade of intervention in labour)- and I'm not sure I want to start down that chain, or if its even needed. I like my MCHN a lot, so its no punishment to go see her, I just feel like its starting something over nothing. My mummy instincts tell me there is nothing wrong, but then how do I really know? Early intervention/ assistance is important in these things, right?
Advice appreciated, thanks!!