VBA2C and inverted t incision - is it too risky?
I've posted a couple of times in this section and really appreciated the answers you've all given so i'm putting this one out there too....
Baby #3 is due 11 Feb. previous 2 babies born by 'emergency' c-section and unfortunately the incision made last time seems to be an inverted t shaped.
Not much data available about risk figures as women are advised to have a repeat c-section. Going off what is available, the risk figures for rupture range from 2 - 8%. But the studies all lump classical, J shaped and inverted T shaped incisions together.
There's no way of knowing how high the vertical section of the scar is as it wasn't written down. My understanding is if it is just restricted to the lower segment, it is much stronger than if the cut ran into the upper area of the uterus.
Reason for this type of incision was 'shoulder dystocia' which meant the shoulder was stuck. it's been mentioned to me by medical professionals that it may have been a question of competence or lack of skill but there's nothing i can do about that now.
So with this unknown of scar size, would you still try VBA2C?
I have an independent midwife who will come over whenever i want her to and the plan would be to transfer to hospital at about 4 cm (active labour stage). I trust her and my husband but it was made really clear to me yesterday that the hospital staff will want to do a c-section the minute i get there and that would be something i'd had to work through whilst in labour......
Do you think i'm taking a stupid risk by going for vba2c in this circumstance?