Baby bonus vs 18 wks min wage payment
I am wondering if anyone could shed some light on this topic :pray:.
I'm hoping to spend as much time possible at home with the LO's when number 3 comes along. My employer offers 14 weeks of paid maternity leave and I have the opportunity to take 28 weeks of half pay. Ideally I'd like the payments to overlap though, even if it means I have to go back to work earlier - just so I don't have to stress about $$. I'm not sure if we'd be entitled to any FTB A or B (we haven't previously, but then again thats not speaking to anyone at Centrelink, just me working from the info on their website).
DH and I would make less than $75K in the 6 mths after #3 is born, so we'd be entitled to the baby bonus.
On paper is appears we would be financially better off taking 14 wks of full pay maternity leave, then take the parental payment of 18 wks at minimum pay, and then possible some annual leave not including any annual leave which is 6 wks a year. So 38 weeks all up.
I guess amongst all of my above ramblings, why would people still opt for the baby bonus if we'd be better off financially on the minimum wage option???