:
Let's be up-front about it
Joanna Moorhead
November 24, 2006 06:00 PM
Breastfeeding in public is often stigmatised, yet what could be more natural and healthy? We need more 'lactivism' to get the message out.
A few days ago, I flew from Miami to London: sitting two rows away from me, a baby of about six months. As the plane rose, so too did the screams of the child: and so, also, did the hackles of the passengers. If there is anything quite as exquisitely torturous as being forced to listen to an infant's piercing screams while locked into a small space, knowing you have many more hours of it ahead and that you are entirely powerless to affect it, then I cannot think what it might be.
There is, though, a solution. No small child need cry on an aeroplane - because breastfeeding is nature's solution to clearing the nasal and aural passages that, when there is a change of air pressure, cause the child to scream in pain. When my four children were younger, I travelled thousands of miles by air with never a squeak out of any of them. I simply plugged myself into my seat, plugged my baby onto my nipple, and prepared for a silent take-off.
All of which is just part of why the attendant on the Delta flight from Vermont to New York got it so wrong when she told mum Emily Gillette she found her breastfeeding "offensive".
Offensive! In a sane world, airlines should offer breastfeeding mothers free flights, not frogmarch them off because they refuse to cover themselves up with a blanket.
Then again, the world does seem a bit insane when it comes to breastfeeding. Consider this: as a society we worry, nay we agonise, over our kids. Are they bright enough; will they get a chest infection; are they speaking clearly enough; will they be fat teenagers; are they going to die of heart disease? And then along comes a wonder-drink (OK, so it's millions of years old - it's just the research that's new) that makes them smart; that reduces their risk of chest infections; that encourages early speaking; that keeps them slim in childhood and even into adolescence; that reduces their risk of heart disease. You'd think we would be doing everything we could to get that drink down them, right?
But no, we don't. As a society, we find it somehow - as the flight attendant said - offensive. Because tits, well, they're for blokes, really, aren't they? Not for babies. (I was once hugely amused, while breastfeeding on a bus, by a man who gave me disapproving stares from behind page three of The Sun!) We've got a bit of a hang-up about breasts and their raison d'etre in the west, it seems to me.
But things are changing. Scotland now has a law making it illegal to object to a woman breastfeeding in public. And there is a campaign to follow suit in England. It's all part of a new movement, "lactivism" - that I'm proud to say I'm passionate about. As, too, are - tacitly - the millions of tiny people the world over who are going to grow up healthier, happier - and, at times, quieter - because of it.