Where to Live Dilemma - Does This Sound Sensible? (Grab A Cuppa - Tis An Epic)
I'm constantly in a "where to live" dilemma but I think I have come up with a good solution - let me know what you think.
We (DP, DSD, DD and I) currently live in a 3-bedroom place and are TTC. Last time I suffered from a medical condition called SPD or unstable pelvis in the later stages of the pregnancy and quite severely for six months after DD was born. That makes it excruciating to bend, stand or walk - particularly walking up hills. Now, 19 months later it is still not right so the idea of having another baby is very scary. In addition, our current house has four big steps at the front and we are sort of in the middle of a hill. So not very easy to get out and about with a pram. I spent a lot of time when DD was little trying to figure out where I could walk to avoid hills and there's not a lot of options. I can't tell you how frustrating this was. So imagine my dread at the thought of struggling up my front steps with a double pram and having to negotiate hills if my condition recurs, which it is likely to.
I don't drive but loading a pram into a car would also be almost impossible with my dodgy pelvis anyway but it does mean I'm reliant on my own two little feet to get me around.
It has seriously been doing my head in. DP is reluctant to move because we are in a great area and we are very close to trains and trams. He has, however, come to realise how important it is for me to be able to get out of the house without having to negotiate steps and hills.
We could also do with a 4br place (for extra DS or DD) but we don't know how long we will need 4brs for as DSD is almost 16 and she likes the idea of moving out of home when she hits 18 so we may only need 4brs for a couple of years.
So ... basically, I don't think we can afford to buy a 4br house around here in the non-hilly bit of the suburb but DP and I both love this area. We currently have a very small mortgage (about 14% of our income) but we would need to double it to buy a bigger place once you take into account stamp duty which would take us up to nearly 30% of our income. I'm not comfortable with doubling our mortgage when I only want to work part-time for the forseeable future AND when I would want to stay home full-time again for at least six months for our second child.
However, we could rent out this house and rent a bigger house for only $100 extra per week and still make payments on our existing mortgage.
That would mean that we could rent somewhere without front steps in a non-hilly area for a couple of years, still be paying off our mortgage and then we could reassess down the track and figure out whether we still need a 4br place or if DSD will be leaving home.
Does that sound sensible? Sorry for the novel!