View Single Post
  #3 (permalink)  
Old September 6th, 2009, 08:23 PM
Snacks's Avatar
Snacks Snacks is offline
Behind every great man is a woman... rolling her eyes.
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 3,736
Snacks has an excellent reputationSnacks has an excellent reputationSnacks has an excellent reputationSnacks has an excellent reputationSnacks has an excellent reputationSnacks has an excellent reputationSnacks has an excellent reputationSnacks has an excellent reputationSnacks has an excellent reputationSnacks has an excellent reputationSnacks has an excellent reputation
Default

Hi Kate. I'm sorry, I don't have any written information or links for you. However in everything I have heard about VBAC, I've consistently heard that women who have experienced "classic" cesareans (where the incision runs vertically down the uterus like your friend's tear) are at a far increased risk of rupture - a risk of up to 12% I believe? The midwifery today journal says this type of scar is a contraindication to VBAC. They also acknowledge that there is anecdotal evidence that some women have successfully birthed subsequent babies vaginally, though. But the stats are not great.
Certainly rupture can have devastating consequences for both mother and baby. Possibly your friend's best bet is to research risk of uterine rupture in women who've had previous classic cesareans?
All the best to your friend as she makes this decision.
__________________
Amy Dave

Precious fairy princess, Natalie Kate 27/12/06
Gorgeous cherub, Phoebe Grace 31/05/09

Thank you to my generous RAKing friend. Bless you. xx
Reply With Quote