Your options are to say no. You decide what you will and will not have, not them. I will just tell you what I did.
From my research on VBAC I learnt that a VBAC is no more dangerous for mother and baby than a first time mother giving birth. So I expected to be treated the same! I declined constant fetal monitoring, vaginal exams, a cannula JIC, and told them I wouldn't be induced/have a c/s before 42 weeks. I knew all these things would greatly increase my chances of ending up with another c/s and I wanted my VBAC! Anyway, I chose to have an appointment with an OB a few weeks before my due date so I could go over my birth plan and have him document in my file that I'd already been told the risks of declining these things so that I didn't have to have this 'argument' in labour. He told me all the risks of course but accepted that I was informed in my decision and signed off on my birth plan.
There is no way I would have constant monitoring and not be able to move, I had to move to get my baby out. The research shows that having constant monitoring does not improve outcomes for mother or baby. I had intermittent monitoring with a doppler and after my labour my m/w told me that had I of had constant monitoring I would have almost certainly ended up with some intervention because DD2 did get a little distressed right at the end but my m/w knew that this was because I had been pushing for 2 hrs and she was about to be out and was very squished down there and that she would be out very soon so it would be fine. BUT she said if I'd had the monitor on and she saw that reading she would have been obliged to call someone else in according to hospital policy.
Anyways, that's my story, hope it helps in some way

Bookmarks