would you use the "nickname" as name instead of the usual full version?
Ok, sorry if that heading made no sense I find out what sex bubba no 2. is on the weekend & am currently playing the name game with DH. We are 100% set if it is a boy, but having a big more trouble with girl names. I really like a name that I found on ahhh facebook I think LOL as a girls nickname. Each time I've looked it up in baby books it is listed but as.....short version of ????? IYKWIM.
So I'm wondering will people always think it should be the longer name, & will it just seem silly?
For example, someone had a similar thread re: using just Ollie...not Oliver or a friend of mine recently had a baby & called her Jaz......not Jasmine - am I making sense,he,he.
My best friend is called Rosie..just Rosie and not short for Rosmary or anything else. She doesn't seem to have a problem with people assuming it's short for something. I also know of a toddler called Frankie too, that's the name on the birth cert and not a nick name.
If you are always going to use the shortened name then I can't see the point in putting the long version on the birth cert if you don't want it.
i was considering it for my bubba but we decided to call him james on his birth cert and call him jamie which isnt really a short version lol but DH's mum calls him james and i dont like it grr so im already having issues with his name but my whole family calls him jamie
My personal preference has always been to christen them with the full version of the name; that way, later on in life when they are adult, they can choose whether they want to be known as the full name or the shortened name. If they are christened the shorter version of the name, they don't have that option.
Besides, having a longer name provides an important cue to children regarding how much trouble they're in... LOL
Well depends.
Nate is Nate, not Nathanial or Nathan so I guess his name is a shortened version.
However, that said, in my personal opinion only some names are too cutesy to use as real names. I'd hate to think my kid would be embarrassed by their name later when there could have been an easier option.
One of my friends is a Rob not a Robert because his mother didn't like Robert. Then he became a ski instructor and started calling himself Roberto PMSL. So I guess if they like the longer name they'll use it anyway....
There are heaps of shortened versions of names that I think suit little kids better, or I just don't like the actual name but I love the nickname, but I'm the type that would put the full name on the birth certificate and then just use the shortened version. I think for me, I say to myself, 'What if the child doesn't like the 'kid' version when they get older?' or 'What if they end up in a professional sort of job and want a more 'serious' name in order to be taken seriously by colleagues/clients/employers etc?'
Then there's always the situation where you love the nickname, but it doesn't 'flow' so well with your surname but the long version does.
My prime example is the name Katherine - not a big fan of 'Katherine', but I LOVE Katie and wanted to use it for one of the girls (DH didn't like it so it was out). But Katie can sound quite juvenile, so I thought if I put 'Katie' on the birth cert, she might want a more formal name later in life. And, Katie and Kate just don't go with our surname, but Katherine sounded lovely with it.
If that makes any sense...
I also find it really annoying that BIL's name on his birth cert is 'Chris' - not Christopher or Christian. Just Chris. It's a pain for when I'm cranky with him or am about to launch into a lecture hahaha - 'Chriiiissss...' just doesn't have quite the same ring as 'CHRIS-to-pheeerrrr...' lol. I would have liked it better if his parents had put Christopher on the birth cert and then just called him Chris hahaha.
My sisters name is Amanda but she's been called Mandy since birth. She hates Amanda and my Mum has always said she wishes she'd called her Mandy instead. I also know alot of people who are called shortened versions of their names and have no issues ie: Sue/Susan Chirs/Christine. It's a tough call. Can I ask what the name is?
Makes perfect sense to me and the answer is "Yes"! We called DS2 Zander, which is traditionally short for Alexander but not in our case! We call him Zander and Zan for short...
Ok, thanks for replies....it might help if I come out & tell you the name LOL! Was going to keep it secret but I love getting everyone's opinions.
The name is Lottie, commonly a shorten version of Charlotte. Thing is I am not going to use Charlotte as we already have a Charlie (also a known nickname for a girl IYKWIM)....so it's either Lottie or another name. I've been in love with it since I saw it but just not sure what others will think. I did think it could be a short version of Violet, which I love also but DH does not.
I don't think there is anything wrong with calling your baby the shortened version. That way your little one gets called the name that you picked out .. not the long version .. you wish people would shorten!
Last edited by Bella's Lullaby; July 28th, 2009 at 08:06 PM.
I like Lottie but I really like having options so personally I would try to think of another name that it's the shortened version of - if not Violet, what about Violetta?
After much head-scratching, I called DD Katrina. Initially, we called her Kittykat, after a few months she graduated to Kitty and now at nearly two, we're thinking about using her full name. But when she's older, she can choose to use Kitty, Kat, Katie, Trina or Katrina or maybe even Rina. But that's just me, I'm a bit addicted to having options!
would you use the "nickname" as name instead of the usual full version?
I find out what sex bubba no 2. is on the weekend & am currently playing the name game with DH. We are 100% set if it is a boy, but having a big more trouble with girl names. I really like a name that I found on ahhh facebook I think LOL as a girls nickname. Each time I've looked it up in baby books it is listed but as.....short version of ????? IYKWIM.
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks