Kelly has ok'd for me to post this link:
http://www.continuum-concept.org/rea...nalStress.html
I had read a bit (can't even remember where) about soft slings being better for baby spines because they don't create spine compression, where the Baby Bjorn/Papoose style ones are not so ergonomically sound. I forgot where I read it and then I told my sister about this research - not content to just take my word for it, she looked it up and found the link! So I'm posting it here for everyone's reference
Baby Bjorns are commercially successful, as well as other types of carriers, and they promote that closeness with the baby, it's just unfortunate that they run a risk of compromising your baby's back, as well as your own (HAB and Ergo's distribute the weight over back and pelvis, making baby feel much lighter).
I do not intend to make mummies using Bjorns and Papooses feel negligent - as if you would get one in order to hurt your baby! I just want to add to the information pool, for those who want a change or are choosing a carrier.
Cheers![]()





Reply With Quote
i have pasted that article before aswell.....
a thread about BB's.
can we please mods??


Bookmarks