Meh, I don't know.

The study seems to say that there are too many questions and problems with the study but that its only as bad as all the previous research, what I did really like is that there's a nice summary in the discussion of a lot of previous research.

I don't see a 1% rise with 1% more vaccines as significant, especially considering the limitations of autism diagnosis and the methods used in the study and it seems as though neither do the authors. Another large consideration that wasn't talked about was the reasons why the children were vaccinated differently.