... 3456

thread: Bulldog Inducement

  1. #73
    Administrator
    Add Rouge on Facebook

    Jun 2003
    Ubiquity
    9,922

    I think the biggest thing is women need to be ok with the fact that their partner may or may not be a good support person, forcing anyone into an emotional role that doesn't suit them isn't ever going to end well. My DH was just as blind and confused as I was the first time around as neither of us knew what we were doing or had done any research... But the second time around he was a pro. The love and support I felt from him was amazing and there were so many times where even though my doula and a midwife was in the room it truly felt like it was just us, but that also says we had a great doula too.

    I think you are right though, sometimes men just shouldn't be there but their partners need to be ok with that and find the right support person to suit them.

  2. #74
    Registered User

    Dec 2005
    Melbourne, Vic
    4,338

    I actually think its fine. If I was due GF day and my team were gonna play I would want to be induced prior. I'm prolly the only one here that thinks it.

  3. #75
    Lucy in the sky with diamonds.

    Jan 2005
    Funky Town, Vic
    7,070

    On the point about football/career, how important da da da - well the guy is a part of a TEAM. There are several people that can take his place right? It's not like he is the only one there....

  4. #76

    Jan 2008
    3,107

    Brian Lake might be the All Australian FB. He is much needed but I agree with Shell induce me before GF day (only if my team is playing) lol

  5. #77
    Registered User

    Dec 2005
    In Bankworld with Barbara
    14,222

    I fully understand that this is his chosen career, but he needs to get his priorities right. How many of us can say that our DH's would rather we do something risky to bring our child into the world to suit their work? I bet there wouldn't be any. Life is far too short and too precious to put work before something like this.

    You know what the bitter irony is, if this was any other ordinary Mum who wanted to homebirth a baby at 43wks pg she'd be practically burned at the stake for even suggesting it, but here we have a woman who is choosing to give birth early, with a fully medicalised birth, where there are KNOWN risks and everyone is cool with that? Maybe society needs to have a rethink of its collective priorities.

  6. #78
    Registered User

    Jul 2006
    6,869

    So has she had the bub? Did it end in a c/s?

  7. #79

    Jan 2008
    3,107

    It doesnt say that it was a c/s or not

  8. #80
    Registered User

    Dec 2007
    Taking a ride on my grdonkey :D
    2,716

    I actually think its fine. If I was due GF day and my team were gonna play I would want to be induced prior.
    But two whole WEEKS prior, when the baby is not even term? Why not a few days before? Why such a long time before, when it's obvious that the earlier a baby is born, the higher the risk of complications?

  9. #81
    Registered User
    Add Beatrix on Facebook

    May 2007
    within a puff of pink
    3,315

    Most of you have no idea what you are on about.


    For what its worth the lady you are all talking about in this article and debate is my very close cousin.... and not one of you know the deal behind the decision.

    only what you have read in the paper.

    A decision like this isnt made lighly and def not as lightly as the article had made it come across



    ETA- a healthy baby girl born at 4:10pm yest
    Last edited by Beatrix; September 3rd, 2009 at 10:20 AM.

  10. #82
    Registered User
    Add Beatrix on Facebook

    May 2007
    within a puff of pink
    3,315

    Baby Girl born 4:10pm 2/9/2009

    (removed name for privacy)
    8pd 10oz 51cm long
    natural delivery
    Last edited by Beatrix; September 3rd, 2009 at 10:40 AM.

  11. #83
    Lucy in the sky with diamonds.

    Jan 2005
    Funky Town, Vic
    7,070

    So it was a medical decision then????

  12. #84
    Registered User
    Add Beatrix on Facebook

    May 2007
    within a puff of pink
    3,315

    as much as i would love to discuss my cousin medical procedure with you all, I dont think its my position too

  13. #85
    Lucy in the sky with diamonds.

    Jan 2005
    Funky Town, Vic
    7,070

    Wasn't asking about intimate details. No one wishes any ill will to the parents or the baby, and I'm pretty sure everyone was more concerned the mother was going to have a hard time due to the induction.
    Of COURSE we are only going off what was reported in the paper - and direct quotes from the father, it's still ok to talk about it and no one is silly enough to think the papers know everything.
    Last edited by Lulu; September 3rd, 2009 at 11:32 AM. : for Rory!

  14. #86
    Registered User
    Add Beatrix on Facebook

    May 2007
    within a puff of pink
    3,315

    Shannon was perfectly fine with the inducement.

  15. #87
    Registered User

    Jan 2006
    Melbourne
    2,732

    Sorry girls it has been driving me nuts - the correct term is induction

    Back in my box now........

  16. #88
    Sweet Bliss Guest

    Congratulations to Shannon and her family on the arrival of their new daughter! I am glad everything went well and hope everyone is enjoying their new little miracle.
    xoxoxo
    Last edited by Sweet Bliss; September 3rd, 2009 at 11:25 AM.

  17. #89
    Registered User

    Dec 2006
    In my own private paradise
    15,272

    i'm glad everything went ok and that bubba arrived safe and sound

    great size for a 38 week bub too (E was 8pd2 at term)

  18. #90
    Sweet Bliss Guest

    Sorry girls it has been driving me nuts - the correct term is induction

    Back in my box now........
    Lol, I know, I wonder if it was a male that wrote the article from the herald sun and gave it that title!
    Last edited by Sweet Bliss; September 3rd, 2009 at 11:33 AM.

... 3456