thread: Head "engaged" question...

  1. #1
    Registered User

    Oct 2007
    Brissy
    2,208

    Question Head "engaged" question...

    Ok, so I would just like some clarification of the term "engaged" - but first here's my story...

    I have a friend who is 40+1wks and has been told that the baby's head hasn't engaged at all (that is, bub is still free floating) and that means she is likely to need a caesar. (By the way, this is at a hospital where 4 of my other friends have been told the same thing - and ended up with C sections)

    Now I know that it's quite common for babies heads to not engage till labour, (that happened to me with DD!) but does that mean that a baby can still be free floating then engage or does it have to be settled into the pelvis somewhat before properly "engaging"?!

    Please wise ones, shed some light on this for me!!!
    Thanks

  2. #2
    Registered User

    Feb 2006
    NSW Central Coast
    5,301

    I'm not absolutely sure about any of your questions, sorry, but I know my DD wasn't engaged at all when I was induced. It took almost 24hrs, but I gave birth vaginally. I'm pretty sure bubs doesn't 'need' to be engaged, my dr told me just the other day it doesn't matter that my baby isn't engaging and is up quite high, even at this late stage. I don't know if that helps

  3. #3
    Registered User

    Nov 2003
    Wodonga, Vic
    786

    I am not engaged and am a "lady in waiting". My #1 was the only one to be engaged before going into labour. Although I don't know if bubs needs to be engaged to go into labour. All my bubs have been born naturally/vag. Will be interested to hear others stories.

  4. #4
    Registered User

    Dec 2007
    Sunny Qld
    14,682

    Mine isn't engaged either - and everyone is still supporting my VBAC...

  5. #5
    Registered User

    Feb 2006
    Eastern 'Burbs
    716

    Oh please! That sounds so silly! In saying that, I am no midwife or Ob. so could be wrong!

    My first didn't engage until labour started. I was told on Wed that this bub has engaged but that it didnt' mean much except bubs was in a comfy position for birth...that it could 'un-engage' but it was unlikely.

    Hope your freind isn't listening to her Ob!

  6. #6
    Registered User

    Oct 2007
    Brissy
    2,208

    I know, it sounds silly to me too - and I have been encouraging her to stand up for what she wants (to go into labour naturally!) but then I'm no expert - that's why I'm asking you guys!!

  7. #7
    Registered User

    Oct 2007
    Brissy
    2,208

    Schmickers? Alan? Anyone else want to shed some light on the sitcho?!

  8. #8
    Registered User

    Feb 2006
    Eastern 'Burbs
    716

    Have you checked out the article in the birth articles? There's one called 'baby not engaged?' which is quite informative.....should have all the info your freind needs

  9. #9
    Registered User

    Oct 2007
    Brissy
    2,208

    Yeah thanks CC - have passed it on

  10. #10
    Registered User
    Add ~clover~ on Facebook

    Sep 2007
    travelling
    9,557

    The only one of mine that engaged before labour was my first.

    Tell her not to let them do a ceaser. She can refuse if it's not an emergency.

    I really hope she goes ok.

  11. #11
    Registered User

    Oct 2007
    Brissy
    2,208

    Well she had a caesar... haven't heard any other details yet.
    Glad mum & bub are well though