thread: if you had a LOOONNNNGGG first labour, how was your second?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Registered User

    Sep 2007
    Brisbane
    5,729

    if you had a LOOONNNNGGG first labour, how was your second?

    Trying to prepare my head space to get this baby out. But I really really don't want another long drawn out multi day drama. Anyone got any good news?

  2. #2
    BellyBelly Member

    Oct 2004
    Cairns QLD
    5,471

    Sorry, my second was longer. BUT was also posterior.

  3. #3
    Registered User

    Sep 2007
    Brisbane
    5,729

    DD1 was posterior too. Ouch!

  4. #4
    Registered User

    Jul 2006
    Cloud nine :D
    6,309

    1st baby took FOREVER! i swear she was never going to come out...

    2nd baby was 6 hours - and oh so fantastic!

  5. #5
    BellyBelly Life Subscriber. Love a friend xxx

    Sep 2008
    Melbourne
    1,424

    First baby - 24 hours with the latter 12 quite awful and ended in lots of intervention

    Second baby - 1.5 hours (about 4 hours of easy pre-labour) and a brilliant, beautiful, empowering birth. Good news enough?!

  6. #6
    Registered User

    Sep 2007
    Brisbane
    5,729

    First baby - 24 hours with the latter 12 quite awful and ended in lots of intervention

    Second baby - 1.5 hours (about 4 hours of easy pre-labour) and a brilliant, beautiful, empowering birth. Good news enough?!
    Yes

    DD1 was 54 hours including all the pre labour, but more than 24 of established. It was mentally so exhausting. I'd take your second labour any day!

  7. #7
    Registered User

    Oct 2008
    Victoria
    4,601

    My first labour was 22 hours of established labour, as well as 2 hours of pushing. I had no urge to push and it was the hardest thing I have ever done. I needed assistance but he was too far up for ventouse hence me pushing him out on my own.

    I had my second baby late last year and it was the most amazing labour, such a contrast! It was not quite 2.5 hours of established labour, I didn't really push until the last little bit as he was just coming down on his own for the most part. It wasn't really very painful in comparison to my first.

  8. #8
    Registered User

    Feb 2008
    1,163

    I have good news for you Maruschke
    First baby, very very long and drawn out.
    Second, shockingly quick!
    48hrs vs 6hrs - from first contraction to birth.

    I think it had a lot to do with having birthed before - body knowing what to do, hormone pathways already set up etc, but also, I was really excited about the second birth, really ready and looking forward to it. I think that the major difference in my case was mindset, environment and support. For my first, all went well at home but when I went into hospital, after a terrible drive there and a few 'incidents' with staff at the hospital I swear my cervix closed up and decided not to open again. For my second, I stayed home, never had to get in a car, called for the people I wanted there and in the end it all just happened. In fact, I was pushing for more of the labour than anything. My cervix obviously felt very comfortable that time

  9. #9
    Registered User

    May 2008
    Gtown
    666

    if you had a LOOONNNNGGG first labour, how was your second?

    Second baby was only 1.5hrs and once waters had broken two pushes and she was out! This third baby however is proving more troublesome. Prelabour for three days now stopping and starting is doing my head in :-(

  10. #10
    Registered User

    Sep 2007
    Brisbane
    5,729

    Second baby was only 1.5hrs and once waters had broken two pushes and she was out! This third baby however is proving more troublesome. Prelabour for three days now stopping and starting is doing my head in :-(
    How frustrating! But exciting at the same time. DD1 is a mothers day baby .

  11. #11

    May 2008
    Melbourne, Vic
    8,631

    40hrs versus 6hrs and 8lbs versus almost 11 - DS just barreled his way out! But what a great birth it was!

    I was a mothers day baby too!

  12. #12
    Registered User

    Sep 2007
    Brisbane
    5,729

    40hrs versus 6hrs and 8lbs versus almost 11 - DS just barreled his way out! But what a great birth it was!

    I was a mothers day baby too!
    OP, were you induced for #2? Because that is a possibility!

  13. #13
    Registered User

    Apr 2009
    Melbourne
    72

    first was about 66 hours, posterior and really painful. natural birth. DS was 4 kgs.

    second was 8 hours from start to finish and dare I say it, rather easy. DD was 3.3 kgs.

    third was also 8 hours from start to finish but more painful, especially the last couple minutes of pushing. DS was 4.3 kgs!

  14. #14
    Registered User

    Oct 2007
    Middle Victoria
    8,924

    My first was only around 12 hours established labour (so not really long), but my 2nd was only around 2 hours of full on labour. He was also a lot bigger (almost 11lb v 8lb 4). DS was just in an awesome position, and i was able to move around alot more. My first, DD, was born posterior.

    At the start of DSs labour, i struggled because i thought 'i can't do this for another 27 hours' because i thought i would have a long labour (as i had syntocinon with my first), but when i realised that things were going a lot quicker i was able to focus and cope alot better.

  15. #15
    BellyBelly Life Subscriber & MPM

    Feb 2007
    Melbourne
    5,462

    I had a 37 hour first labour (it was horrific). My second was much less (maybe 15 hours including pre-labour?). My third labour was only 4 1/2 hours and awesome. I really think my third labour was so much quicker because I saw just the right chiropractor throughout pregnancy (I have an unstable pelvis) and she made sure my pelvis was in the optimal position for labour. My third labour was also a pain-free calm birth and I was very active which also helped speed things along .

  16. #16
    Registered User

    Sep 2007
    Brisbane
    5,729

    My first was only around 12 hours established labour (so not really long), but my 2nd was only around 2 hours of full on labour. He was also a lot bigger (almost 11lb v 8lb 4). DS was just in an awesome position, and i was able to move around alot more. My first, DD, was born posterior.

    At the start of DSs labour, i struggled because i thought 'i can't do this for another 27 hours' because i thought i would have a long labour (as i had syntocinon with my first), but when i realised that things were going a lot quicker i was able to focus and cope alot better.
    Thanks, that is exactly what I want to happen.

  17. #17
    Registered User

    Apr 2009
    Sydney
    2,350

    Oooo love reading these quicker labour stories! Keep em coming, you fill me with hope!

    Also, congrats Jackilicky!!!