thread: Its about time

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Registered User
    Add MummyDuck on Facebook

    Nov 2007
    Melbourne
    1,065

    Its about time

    Cost of paid paternity leave investigated

    Its about time this happened!!

    What annoys me is that MSN are running a poll on it and presently:

    21514 People say yes to being offered paid parental leave
    and still.....

    16450 say no!

    I would love to see what everyone's reasoning for this is though.

  2. #2
    Registered User
    Add Kazbah on Facebook Follow Kazbah On Twitter

    Sep 2006
    Dandy Ranges ;)
    7,526

    Cool

    My hubby & I work for the same (very large) company.

    If my career works out the way it should, then for the next bub ideally I'd be going back to work after the 6 weeks and he'd stay at home for the year. But our company doesn't allow that. Even if I was only paid for the sick leave, he isn't entitled to the 24 weeks half-pay unless I'm incapacitated. It sux as it currently is.

    To be honest, re the funding of it all, if we were taxed *specifically* for maternity leave (similar to HECS repayments) then that'd be grand. Imagine, electing to pay extra tax from age 16 (or whatever) and that would be returned to you as maternity / paternity pay OR as a lump sum! That'd rock!

  3. #3
    Moderator

    Oct 2004
    In my Zombie proof fortress.
    6,449

    I have tried nutting out different ways for employers to fund paid maternity and it is hard to do. It means more administration and more expense, not so bad for large business, but not great for small business, who I feel is overburdened as it is. So something that is federally funded seems fairer and makes more sense. Will quite interested to see how they work it out.

  4. #4
    Registered User

    Jul 2007
    Fort St. James, British Columbia
    235

    In Canada we have up to 60% paid leave for 1 year. The Government pays out of the same fund as unemployment benefits. The mom has 12 weeks of maternity leave and the rest is parenting leave and either mom or dad can take that so long as the weeks add up to a total of 1 year. It is wonderful. Giving kids and families time to bond and a good start I am sure it saves money in the long run.

    Although I don't qualify this time as I haven't worked since #2 was born.

  5. #5
    Registered User

    Nov 2006
    over the blue mountains and then some...
    367

    If the goal is to ensure that women return to the workforce I don't think any system will work properly unless it allows you to be paid your current wage - I have read the bill (being a bit of a nerd) that was previously put forward and 'revamped' at the end of last year and it proposes to pay women minimum wage. As I am our primary income earner that would be completely useless to us.

    I do agree however that if the employer is required to pay the leave they will simply stop hiring women of child bearing ages.

    What I find curious is the strong public resistance to govt funded mat leave... given that all state and federal empoyees are currently entitled to 12 weeks leave at full pay - tax payers are already funding it - why not make it fair for those of us that don't work for the government... anyway, just my thoughts....

  6. #6
    Registered User

    Mar 2007
    outer South East Melbourne
    2,881

    Australia is one of the few nations that don't provide an across the board paid maternity leave scheme - I know one of the others is the US.

Similar Threads

  1. Miscarriage & Loss - Your Stories and Loss Support
    By BellyBelly in forum Your Stories of Loss
    : 0
    : July 9th, 2007, 09:08 AM