Reply With QuoteThat's great news xox
Registered User
Glad you're OK hun, and the baby is too - quick question though: how tall are you?
If you're short, you're more likely to measure "ahead" just as tall people are more likely to measure "behind" - I would say it isn't an exact science, but that would be elevating measuring a bump to the field of "science", which it is not.
Last edited by Ca Plane Pour Moi; November 4th, 2011 at 07:47 AM. : grammar
Registered User
That's great news xox
2014 BellyBelly RAK Recipient.
That's great news hun!
Great news
Registered User
TheFlyingButter- Actually Im a bit above average..I am 5'7"
Thank you everyone..I feel so amazingly happy this has bothered me terribly!!
Registered User
Oh thats excellent hun
I was going to suggest that perhaps because th ebaby is measuring larger that the scanner didn't want to offer anything one way or the other.
On the cervix length its perfectly NORMAL for it to lengthen and shorten right throughout the pregnancy. With DD pregnancy one week I measured 4.6, two weeks later it was down to 2cm (which sent me into panic mode folowwing the prem arrival of my first) then a scan a few days later showed it was back up to 3.1cm.
It depends on the babys position as far as I am aware as well and just the general changes int he body so do not be worried too much about it. Yes it MAY indicate a possible early birth butNOT in all cases
Nae x x
Registered User
I'm glad you got an update and it's great news. How worrying it must have been for you.
xox
Registered User
I am so pleased that it was good news
Sent from my iPad on Tapatalk
Bookmarks