Well said Schmickers and Tobily :clap:
I may well be a natural birth nut trying to impress her ideals on others. :redface:
I am one of the great number of women who went to hospital the first time believing that everyone there would have my best interests at heart.
No one told me when I asked for an epidural that I just halved my chance of being able to push my baby out unassisted. When I resisted the use of forceps, I was threatened, yes threatened, with a c/s if I did not agree. No one told me that forceps required me to have my legs in stirrups and an automatic episiotomy which took 2 months to heal. In fact, I didn't even know I had had an episiotomy until I was being stitched up.
Importantly, no one helped me cope with labour or made me believe that I was capable. I was given drugs as soon as I asked for them and told it was a good idea. What I really needed was someone to get me through the hard bits with support, not drugs. I just didn't know beforehand that I would need that. I thought that is what the midwives would do. I was unlucky that day and was assigned one who liked epidurals.
Do I think there is a conspiracy, not necessarily. But I do believe that the very nature of obstetrics sees birth not as a normal function with great natural variability that is celebrated, but as a potential tragedy that should be feared.
I also know that much of obstetric practice is not evidence based. Take, for example, the Electronic Foetal Monitors. There is no evidence that their use improves outcomes at all, but it is standard practice in most Australian hospitals to use them. The biggest contribution EFM has made is increasing the c/s rate.
So I guess I am one of those women, and I carry my birth baggage around with me - and I wish I had met someone like me before I had my first baby.

