thread: Was it true for you that #2 was easier to conceive than #1?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    BellyBelly Member

    Oct 2007
    Gold Coast
    860

    Was it true for you that #2 was easier to conceive than #1?

    Obviously, this post is for anyone who is at least on their second pregnancy. Hopefully it's in the right place, and not upsetting anyone...

    I'm interested to hear if anyone who was LTTC with their first baby, then found it much faster with the second or subsequent conceptions? Especially if endo or cysts were involved and laparoscopies were needed (not so much assisted conception).

    DD took two years during which time I was diagnosed with endo and had cysts removed. Now we are TTC again, and a scan shows there are some cysts again. I don't want to go the operation route if I don't have to, but at 36 I feel I can't leave it too long trying naturally.

    How many months would you/did you wait before getting help again?

  2. #2

    Oct 2008
    2,880

    Hey,
    I'm not in this position at all but I know that I will be at some point. I'd go and see your specialist now.
    There are lots of women who have lots of trouble TTC #1 and then you hear about them falling pregnant naturally with #2 but there are no guarantees that this will happen.

    I hope that you get the answers you're looking for soon,
    Sue x

  3. #3
    BellyBelly Member

    Feb 2008
    Perth
    615

    crystal - for us #2 was much harder to concieve than #1. DS was natural conception on the first month. #2 took seven cycles for us to concieve and about to move on to IVF. I am only 30 and after no cycle returned after DS I went straight to AC. With your age I would be seeing a specialist asap. Sorry couldn't bring you happy news.

  4. #4
    Moderator

    Dec 2006
    Smidgen-ville
    3,736

    I don't think there are any rules about number 2 being easier or harder than number 1 to be honest. Some people with number 1 have no trouble at all and then struggle for years for a second. And then vice versa applies too, of course.

    I wouldn't nesessarily think that AC would be your next step, but maybe some monitoring etc might give you some more of a helping hand.

    It can't hurt to make an appointment to see someone, and just get some advice or some more information.

    Good Luck

  5. #5
    Registered User

    Jun 2006
    Where the sun shines brightly!
    906

    A good friend of mine took 1.5 years to conceive her first, then 2 months to conceive her second - both naturally. I think it may also have something to do with the extensive time she & her hubby spent preparing their bodies for the first conception (detoxing etc) and then avoiding alcohol etc whilst pregnant and breastfeeding. So her body was more 'pure' in a sense, second time around. Of course there are no hard and fast rules.

    I definitely agree that you should have the cysts etc removed first as this may also cause additional pain during pregnancy and labour should conception occcur.
    I think what will increase your chances of conception (natural or assisted) above anything else is to eliminate as many accumulated toxins (pesticides, chemicals and heavy metals etc) from yours and DH's body prior to TTC. Eating an alkaline diet, organic (where possible), avoiding food additives, using only natural personal care products (ie MiEssence) and taking a chelating supplement to remove heavy metals and pesticides (ie Zeolite - Natural Cellular Defense) will make your bodies more hospitable environments to foster conception. There are also some very powerful herbal remedies which can assist in the elimination of toxins, but you would both need to consult with a registered Naturopath who specialises in NFM (Natural Fertility Management) for that.

    Best of luck XX

  6. #6
    Registered User

    Feb 2008
    Country Victoria
    5,945

    what an interesting thread! ive been wondering the same thing...