thread: Curious...

  1. #1
    TeganRheana Guest

    Curious...

    Just curious as to what you all think re:these pics...would you say you could tell the gender from them? I had this scan done at 19 wks.

    Pic1: Looking up from below bottom (right) and thighs
    http://i47.photobucket.com/albums/f1...iggerBubs1.jpg

    Pic2:Looking at belly etc, legs are crossed at the feet (left)
    http://i47.photobucket.com/albums/f1...iggerBubs2.jpg

    Pic3: Closer pic of bubs with legs crossed at feet
    http://i47.photobucket.com/albums/f1...iggerBubs3.jpg

    Now after looking at all of those would you say this DEFINATELY looks like a boy??

    Pic4: Boy?
    http://i47.photobucket.com/albums/f1...iggerBubs4.jpg

  2. #2
    Registered User

    Dec 2006
    386

    I have no idea - did the sonographer give you a clue?

  3. #3
    TeganRheana Guest

    Yeah she said "hmm it looks like a boy" and I said "are you sure?" and she said "well I can't be 100% sure but I would put my bets on it being a boy"....she did it all very quickly...it was weird lol

    We are going with a boy....just as long as bub is healthy it doesn't really matter, I just can't get a handle on how these pics were all from the same ultrasound session yet they seem to contradict each other...cause to me, the first 3 there are no boy bits to be seen and then in the last there is a blob which she pointed out was boy bits.

  4. #4
    Registered User

    Jul 2006
    6,869

    I cant even make out bub!! Sorry

  5. #5
    Registered User

    Apr 2004
    194

    yes definitely in the first three its hard to tell and the last looks like a boy.

  6. #6
    Registered User

    Sep 2004
    Sydney's Norwest
    4,954

    I would say going by the last scan pic it is a boy. I have seen a few boy scan's now

    And for what it's worth, they will never tell you that they are 100% certain. They like to cover their backs.

  7. #7
    Registered User

    Mar 2007
    351

    He looks like a boy to me!

  8. #8
    Registered User

    Dec 2006
    386

    I just had another look at picture 4. At first I had no idea what perspective the shot was taken at. However, if its a bottom shot (showing 2 legs) then there is definately something in the middle.

  9. #9
    Registered User

    Feb 2007
    Coombabah
    275

    Hmmm....thats a toughy.

    From the first pic I thought girl....then the last was either a boy or the unbillical cord.

    Yeh....a tough one to call.

    Jac

  10. #10
    TeganRheana Guest

    Thnx girls.

    They are not full body shots of the baby - None of the pics have the baby's arms or head in them.

    The first one is looking up underneith the babies bottom (which is at the right) and in between the babies thighs.

    The second and third ones are of the babies tummy (big and round - which is at the right) and then you can see the legs which are long with the feet crossed at the ankles to the left.

    The third is supposed to be of in between the legs, with a little blob and a not so visible arrow pointing to it.

    lol