So ... I've been driving myself batty for at least the last 12 months.
We live in a 3br house with DSD and DD.
We are TTC so that will mean another baby. Have no problem sharing a room with a baby and then for baby to share a room with DD.
BUT ... we really need a study. I'm planning on going back to uni next year and DP runs his own website and currently his stuff is spread out all over the dining table. In addition, DP is a shiftworker and often sleeps during the day. So very frustrating trying to creep around the house while he's in bed.
Added to that, I don't really want to move too far from this area as it would mean 16-year-old DSD changing schools and I don't want to disrupt her.
If all that wasn't enough (!), I don't drive and if I do get pregnant again, I'm likely to suffer with SPD again and possibly be wheelchair bound this time so hilly areas are out. At the moment we're in the middle of a hill so to get anywhere other than the shops at the end of the street involves walking up or down hills.
I don't want to increase the mortgage too much if we're TTC which means we can't get a bigger house in the same suburb.
BUT I don't have a crystal ball. I have no idea what we will need in two years time. Could be:
2br house plus study (if TTC is not successful and DSD moves out to go to uni)
3 br house plus study (if we have another baby but DSD moves out)
4br house plus study (if we have another baby and DSD stays)
I mean, honestly, it is so bloody confusing.
But, hooray, I think I have found a good solution.
Fairfield.
We can get a bigger house without breaking the bank.
Fairfield is flat so manageable in a wheelchair and it has good public transport.
Hoooooooooooooray! I'm much relieved and excited to have solved that dilemma.
Now let's hope sales prices skyrocket in Northcote (for our selling price) and stay stable in Fairfield.
Thought I'd found a perfect solution. Thought I'd been pretty realistic about it having looked at actual selling prices over the last six months. Then spoke to RE agent and all the sorts of properties he's got coming up, well the owners want about $100K more than similar properties have sold for.
So could be back to the drawing board. Very disappointed. Between having a tight budget and not knowing how many bedrooms we'll need in two years time and whether I'll actually be able to walk (because of pelvic problems likely to recur if we have a second child), this is all a bit of a nightmare.
Keep looking - just bc people want $100K more doesn't mean they will get it either (may seem hard to believe at the moment tho). Fairfield has a great shopping strip (as you prob already know) - great Japanese, Indian, Chinese restaurants and THE BEST charcoal chicken shop!
Don't lose heart - there should be more property on the market soon so perhaps more choice and hopefully less inflated prices (according to DH). Are Alphington/Thornbury/Preston any good? Good luck!
You've probably considered this already, but given budgetary constraints coupled with uncertainty about your needs within the next couple of years, I'd be renting a house and renting yours out. (In fact that's exactly what DP and I will be doing).
Why it makes sense for us (and may also for you):
- we've only owned our house for 2.5 years and don't want to lose out on buying and selling costs just because our needs have changed
- there's heaps less stress associated with finding a rental at the appropriate time, compared to buying and selling property.
- our existing home becomes a rental property and therefore interest, expenses etc are tax deductible - the anticipated tax refund can go toward renting a better place
- by spending a bit more than we're renting our place out for, we can afford a better / bigger house or a house in a better area
- we have ultimate flexibility depending on whether I end up working from home, or go back to work, or DP changes jobs etc... we can shift again if necessary and don't feel tied in for another 5-10 years.
- we don't lose our place on the property ladder!
Bookmarks