we have a 'front and back' jogger after trying my sisters side by side. her twins were different weights and it would pull to the heavier side. it was also hard to fit in places and in the car.
not sure what brand t was (5yrs ago)
Sorry if this has already been answered. Information overload! What's your opinion about the Phil and teds style where baby is underneath compared to a normal looking pram with a litlle toddler seat that looks like it clips on the front? Is there more of a weight restriction with the little seat on the front? Thanks heaps
The reason I didn't go for the toddler seat that clips on the front is firstly, my brand of jogger pram couldn't take one (a weight and stability issue) so I would have to get a new pram anyway, and then secondly, my dd still sleeps in the pram, and i felt that she'd would be better in the strider plus as they seat is full height and both recline, whereas a toddler seat doesn't. Also, I thought that it was fine in terms of space whilst my 2nd was a tiny baby, but as soon as they would get to an age where they wanted to sit up, it would be pretty squashy for the baby, especially as they got bigger. Saying that, it depends if you think your DD will still be pram riding or not. I went for the strider plus as I felt both would be comfy, especially for long walks.
Registered User
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks