I have cut all the boys hair and they have the thickest of thick hair....all were born with super fine hair and the latest of them only had his cut on his 2nd birthday as it was whispy and thin...its really thickened up heaps and i had to recutit today and was astonded by how much came off since it was cut mid January
Mini me has only had 1 trim to date since birth...she has extremly thin hair in comparison to the boys and it took ages to grow.
Maybe hair seems 'thicker' as we cut away the baby hair that is super thin and the normal hairs grows correctly?
I agree it shouldn't make any difference logically, unless it is different on the scalp to actually shaving it and maybe the cold etc or lack of oils being trapped in stimulates something extra? She said to shave, not to cut.
I guess the only way to truely know whether it would have happened or not is to shave half her head and see what happens with the other half - but i can't exactly do that to her.
But i cover my hair, so maybe i should do it to myself... although DH would NOT be impressed.
Hey Onyx - you want to do a "women who cover their hair so nobody will know what we are doing and how freaky we look" trial for 6 months in the name of science and shave one side of our heads??? :P
DS had thin hair. After DH cut it 2-3 times (grade 4 cuts, which was too short) it's now super-thick, just like mine. And it's the same colour mine was as a child, so maybe it would have happened anyway.
But before you could see the cradle cap through the hair, now you can only see the cradle cap when you search through the hair, even with a grade 8 cut. (At age 3, is it still cradle cap? DH did remove it all when he was 1, but it came back.)
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks