I don't advocate removing everything. Just the dangerous stuff, where possible. The oven, for example, can't be moved so we had to implement other measures when he finally took an interest in it. Also, stuff of value is sensible to move, otherwise you take a risk with things that are irreplaceable, where it's preventable!
Distraction is our tool of choice when it comes to the things that DS wants to get into that are inconvenient or potentially damaging to goods that you can't move up higher (like the antique, inherited hallstand we have that has a flap in the bench that DS used to love banging open and shut...can't exactly remove it), the contents of the sideboard etc.
Dangerous things to little people that we took care of: the wood heater, DP built a grate for it; whilst learning to walk we blocked off the kitchen with a baby gate etc.
Baby-proofing really refers to safety matters, not matters of inconvenience. So, Nee, you can probably say this to your mum and she might see it as a compromise, or here's hoping, anyway!
ETA: I was composing when you posted, Charlyfrog! I agree - if you move nothing and expect babies to learn by listening to you, you would have to follow them around everywhere, or keep them strapped into a bouncer to get anything done! (And my DS' nickname is 'mini-monster'!)




Reply With Quote
I think to my DD i am a consultant with interesting ideas, NOT a parent with important rules. My dad says i've been using him as a consultant since i was 18months too so it's probably just one of those things. My DD can READ "no", let alone understand the spoken word, and she STILL doesn't care! LOL.


Bookmarks