All rotavirus vaccines contaminated worldwide - FDA suspends its use

[Pandora]

my son has had it he had the rotateq, 3 doses.
I think the decision to vaccinate or not is very personal amd emotional.
I do worry about whats in them, but also about what could happen if they arent vaccinated, and at the end of the day its a really difficult choise to make.

[Paolo]

my son has had it he had the rotateq, 3 doses.
I think the decision to vaccinate or not is very personal amd emotional.
I do worry about whats in them, but also about what could happen if they arent vaccinated, and at the end of the day its a really difficult choise to make.

You should be extremely concerned about what will happen, if not now, but in years to come.
The term “immunization” (US, Canada) or "immunisation" (UK, Australia, NZ), often substituted for the term "vaccination", is false and should not be used in place of "vaccination", because it is well documented in medical research that vaccination, the direct injection of foreign proteins and other toxic material (particularly known immune-sensitising poisons such as mercury and aluminium compounds, formaldehyde and phenol) sensitises, meaning makes the recipient more, not less, susceptible,
i.e. more easily affected, by what he/she encounters in the future
This means that vaccines do the opposite of immunise, commonly even preventing immunity from developing after natural exposure, in which cases vaccine recipients have gone on to contract the disease not even just once, but several times. (Vaccines "de-immunize".) New, more serious forms of the diseases (e.g. atypical measles) are also now appearing, only in the vaccinated.
Yes, you should worry what's in them.
Isn't this the whole reason to not vaccinate your kids is because you love them.
All you need to know about the great vaccination scam is in the Medical research if you care to read it.
To give an example Polio has never been erradicated by vaccines.
The polio virus is a very small RNA virus, categorized as an enterovirus, meaning that it multiplies primarily in the intestinal tract.
Polio had declined from its peak in 1950 by 80-90% by the time the polio vaccine was introduced in 1956, so the vaccine was not responsible for its decline. Indeed after the vaccine was introduced, the incidence and deaths from polio increased, which was a
major problem.
In 1958 the definition of polio was changed to make the diagnostic criteria so restrictive that it became almost impossible to call an illness polio even when the person suffers paralysis and the polio virus is present.
Immediately this change occurred the number of cases of “polio” crashed, and the number of cases skyrocketed of “other” diseases, such as “viral meningitis” and “cerebral palsy” (up to 75% of these cases are actually polio). All the vaccines - for DPT, MMR, Hib, polio etc are still provoking polio to this day, but the word “polio” is very rarely used. When paralysis occurs it usually does not last more than a couple of days in which cases usually no diagnosis is given when they occur these days.
That'sit in a nutshell. and that is only the tip of the vaccination iceberg.

[Schmickers]

This thread is for discussion of the Rotavirus vaccine. Please stay on-topic.

[Visitor6]

This is about the US standpoint. The Therapeutic Goods Administration (Australia) may comment soon.

Rotarix Vaccine: Update to Clinicians and Public Health Professionals
Rotarix Vaccine: Update to Clinicians and Public Health Professionals
Audience: Pediatric and family practice healthcare professionals, public health professionals
[UPDATED 05/16/2010] FDA has determined it is appropriate for clinicians and health care professionals to resume the use of Rotarix and to continue the use of RotaTeq. Based on a careful evaluation of laboratory results from the manufacturers and its own laboratories, a thorough review of the scientific literature, and input from scientific and public health experts, the agency is revising its recommendation to temporarily suspend use of the Rotarix vaccine. FDA has also determined that RotaTeq vaccine should remain in use.
In its decision, FDA considered that both vaccines have strong safety records, including clinical trials involving tens of thousands of patients as well as clinical experience with millions of recipients. FDA has no evidence that either porcine circovirus (PCV1 or PCV2) poses a safety risk in humans, and notes that neither is known to cause infection or illness in humans. The benefits of the vaccines are substantial, and include prevention of hospitalization for severe rotavirus disease in the United States and of death in other parts of the world. he benefits outweigh the risk, which is theoretical. FDA and the manufacturers will continue to investigate the findings of PCV in rotavirus vaccines and will evaluate information from ongoing testing by FDA and the manufacturers