...then why was it being pushed into the arms of young women? Money talks doesnt it!
Yes, and unfortunately it talks enough that the WHO have PRE-approved (as in it can skip much of the testing) for the vaccines to be used on young boys now too.

I was looking at DD's baby book the other night and in big capital letters it says 'DECLINED BY MOTHER' You know - I felt quite proud that I did decline that injection, i dont think its necessary at that age! IMHO I will gladly do it with all my babies The way it was written tho - was like it was a bad thing iykwim?
Yes, apparently you're risking your baby by being cautious and not giving them a vaccination on their first day of life for a disease they are highly unlikely to get at that age . The thing I don't get is the rationale that it's okay to risk auto-immune issues, SIDS, life-long disabilities and even death for a disease that if they do end up getting it (and in a Western country the odds of that are fairly low) *might* one day give them liver cancer in 40 years time. Unless the baby is high risk (i.e. mum has hep b) I don't see how the risk/benefit ratio even comes close to adding up.