I'd love to read the balanced report of this story to be honest. Do you have any further information on it Kelly? Which isn't a propaganda/fund raising exercise by the AVN? Love it how this report states on how the child was ill from birth because of the vac, and the seizures were because of it, whereas in reality, a 9 week prem baby would in my mind stand a good chance of that being as a result of the prematurity not any external influence.

There must have been some reason that the hospital staff were worried for the baby's safety. I am absolutely certain that DoCS do have the childs best interest in mind, and given how much slips through the cracks, this must have been a pretty severe case of suspected abuse for them to remove the children.

Hard to know where the truth lies really. Of course the parents aren't going to agree to claims of abuse, and the AVN is going to go foaming at the mouth rabid for any case involving immunisations (and a way to give negative light to it), and DoCS are going to stand by their decisions to protect the child, and the hospital staff aren't going to say 'whoops, we missed that diagnosis' (which I'm sure wouldn't be for some conspiracal reason to propagate vaccinations lol). So there is so much grey, it's hard to find the truth really.

As I said I'd love to read more information from all sides on this one!