Um.. im an unsure how my post offended you?? Saying that as long as mum and baby are ok at the end of the day is offending? i dont get it. I have reread my post and i dont think i needed to reword it, because its how i feel. If i did offended you, i would think you would do the right thing and pm me regarding this.
And yes i know it is major surgery, but the thing is vaginal birth is pushed to be this most beautiful pleasant easy experience when it always isnt the case. c/s are put to shame because they are major surgery, you may have a longer recovery period and the baby may need assistance once born.. but what i was trying to put across in my post is, what is most important is that mother and baby are ok and are both alive to see the next day. As i also said, in my case, my first vaginal birth was a nightmare. It put my son's life at risk. Thankful he was born before quite fast otherwise i would have had a c/s and would have totally agreed to it. As for recover, i could not walk for 3 months afterwards, nor stand for longer than 10 minutes at a time. I could not DTD without being in pain to the point my eyes watered until my DD was born. So not every vaginal birth is wonderful. I just dont see the whole negative aspect of c/s that the article is trying to portray, when the majority of the time they are there for a reason.. to save lives.
A good friend of mine lost their child because they refused to have a c/s when they were advised it was the best option for mother and baby.. but she had her mind set on a vaginal birth. I also know of another 2 people who i dont know personally, but have lost their babies due to the same reason. It does happen, and i think these OBs give advice that a c/s is neccesary because they are trained in that area and know what they are talking about.





Reply With Quote
Bookmarks