I have a query regarding someone's post about paperwork & labour/delivery.......
After having my 2nd I was given a copy of what Im guessing are casenotes from the midwife. It has all the details on it ie times, pain relief, cervical checks, bubs presentation, contraction rates etc etc Would that be a summary of the paperwork she was filling out when I was in labour? I was surprised to be given it but my OB handed it over knowing a) we move alot and b) Id probably end up having another baby.
No one likes to hear they may have a) made a bad choice based on wrong information supplied by your Dr, or b) blindly trusted a Dr who DIDNT have their best interests at heart. I would hate to have come to terms with a birth I never intended on and then suddenly via statistics discover that it was uneccesary in the first place. Same goes for accessing your own medical records. Would open up a whole can of lawsuits on OBs and hospitals for malpractice (and I consider unneccesary procedures performed on misinformed women malpractice).
Take for instance a person I know. She's in her early 20s, had an emergency csection for her first baby as she was 10 days overdue and he was over 9lbs. She laboured for 3 days/2 failed inductions, never got past 4cm and eventually he had to come out. Thats fine with her. I met her when he was 6wks old and told her that she didnt need to worry about a csection next time just because she had one first time round. She was SHOCKED about this because her hospital told her otherwise. So she was due with her second baby 11mths after #1 and they told her no VBAC/induction because of time-frame, risk of rupture blah blah. Fair enough I guess BUT she ended up going into labour on her own early, got to the hospital in established labour at 5cm with no real issues and they scaremongered her into having a csection! Gave her the "Your baby will die, youll rupture, bleed to death, stop progressing" bull. Considering a) she was in no pain bar contractions and b) her first csection was failure to progress after 2 failed inductions BUT she established labour and dialated further than she had 1st time round ON HER OWN. Pure laziness on the hospitals part and Im betting their statistics reflect this. I was horrified to hear her story afterwards. Bloody disgusting. Now she is pregnant with #3 12mths after 2 c/s and she is planning a Vba2c. No reason to think she wont get it either but she knows she'll come up against heavy opposition from the Drs here even though any reason they could possibly come up with as to why she shouldnt VBAC would be pure scaremongering again.
That is a prime example why statistics SHOULD be available on everything related to birthing, not just c/s rates.




Reply With Quote
)

Bookmarks