Interesting thread my DS wasn't breech but I remember my Nana (now in her 80's) talking about delivering breech babies. To her it was just part of being a midwife and fairly "routine"
Amazing isn't it, my nan had 2 breech bubs both natural, it was just how it was done.
When we were discussing that the Dr's said if i had been in hosp it was an auto c/s she laughed and i said NO i'm serious, they do NOT deliver breech vaginally.
A MW told me that not even she would have known how to do it had i have been in hosp

No we didn't know he was breech, I'd had a quick ultrasound in March, and he was born in May. However my Mum, the baby's father, and myself, and I think maybe the baby's father's Mum - we were all breech births. I had asked a number of times if it was inheritable, and we were told that it wasn't.
We didn't know DD1 was breech either, according to the MW's she was engaged 3/4 but the MW with DD2 said she couldn't have been head first as she wouldn't have turned being that far down. Dad was breech...

I was a footling breech bub.. Mum was induced at about 42wks, laboured for 7hrs middy (or OB) felt a kick while doing an internal and Mum was whisked off for a c section..
So it was happening even then, i wonder where the 'rules' for laboring breech changed.


My nephew was a footling breech - my sister's Ob didn't give her an option ... told her she had to have a c-section, which she did.
Yeah i was told had i been there NO CHOICE aswell.

My DD3 was a footling breech.
My waters broke at 26+6weeks and I was fully effaced and 3cm dilated.
I went to the toilet at 28 weeks (in the hospital) and I felt a tickle just inside my vjayjay and felt five little toes.
They did a bedside u/s and her foot was definitely wedged straight down out through my cervix.
Things went very fast from there as I was rushed off for an emergency classical c/s
cord prolapse is the biggest concern with a footling breech and why they do like to do c/s

Sent from my iPad
I thought it was because of cord prolapse, someone else said there is more chance of the umbilical cord wrapping aswell

I was breech, bum presenting (don't know what that one is called??), Obs palpated mum's belly at 36wks and noted I was breech but said that I had plenty of time to turn so not to worry.

Few days later, mum went into labour early in the morning. Turned up at hosp and the Obs rushed in, did an internal, went "That's a bottom right there, and a foot, no time for c/s, baby is arriving now!"

Apparently I came out doing the splits somehow!

So yeah I was prem and arrived very quickly!
Butt first and you still turned otu ok only kidding hun.

The staff at the hospital have never been able to answer my question about why I was not allowed to birth her naturally. Through my own investigation I think it is because footling breech births carry a 20% risk of cord prolapse. And none of the staff are trained to deliver a footling baby - because they don't do it, none of them have experience with it. They told me that I would have been able to birth her naturally had she been bum first. They also don't try to manually turn footling babies because if your waters break, cord prolapse is also an issue. Bum first and they would have tried.

My labour came as quite a shock to me because the doctor told me the week before that due to her being breech, it was unlikely I would go into labour by myself and if I did, labour would not progress. It was my fastest labour ... and my most traumatic because of how it ended and not getting any answers.

I am still weary of the unknown though. I wish that someone who knew what they were talking about could talk to me about what happened rather than me having to google it all to get answers. But no-one can tell me if there really was any risk or if it was just hospital policy. It was pretty terrifying though. I don't understand the urgency of what happened.

I have a feeling if the operating theatre was busy that night, I would have had her naturally.
It sucks not knowing, i find it hard as so many people have told me i SHOULD have had a c/s, if i were in hospital i would have had no choice and that the risks are so so high we were lucky to both be alive.
But then in my head i think if it's so risky and the nurses are not even aware then how the hell did i manage ALONE on a bathroom floor with no medical intervention, shouldn't more be done to understand HOW to assist in a breech birth rather than just opting for a c/s every time?
Had i of known she was breech then chances are i would have taken the c/s, i would never have 'risked' her life or mine based on the many risks the OB's and MW's give you.. but really it comes down to lack of training and not wanting to be sued.

DD was a footling breech.

Waters broke at 35w+2weeks. Had some weird cramps which I thought were contractions. We knew DD was breech so went straight into hospital. Hooked me up to the monitors and there were no contractions even though I was having what i thought were contractions hooked up. Did an internal, found DD feet poking out!

Was raced down for an 'crash' c-section where the cord prolapsed just as we got there.
You guys are VERY lucky, so glad you were in hospital in time.. i understand there are REAL risks involved in breech and you were so lucky to be ok, it's amazing how different every experience is.

I just wanted to add, Jim still puts his legs and feet in a position very similar to the drawings of footling breech positions, one leg bent and the other one down.
DD1 was VERY wary of her feet when she was younger, hated people touching them, if anyone sat near them or pushed them at MG she FREAKED... mum always joked it was because of her birth, wonder if it is ???


Thanks so much for replying everyone, it's amazing to see stories of other footling breech bubs.