thread: Too small to birth naturally?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Registered User

    Feb 2010
    NSW
    6

    I've heard that this one is generally a scare tactic used by Obs to coerce people into caesarians... not sure of the truth in *that*, BUT I do know that a woman's pelvis is designed to pull apart and stretch right out during labour. No doctor can really predict a woman's ability to stretch until she is right there doing it!

    My midwife told me of a tiny woman, a size six, who looked barely pregnant. She was giving birth and the baby just kept coming, and coming, and coming - it was a whopper! 11 pounds all up. Both mother and baby were a-ok. I love hearing stories like that!

  2. #2
    Registered User

    Mar 2007
    6,979

    I've heardBUT I do know that a woman's pelvis is designed to pull apart and stretch right out during labour. No doctor can really predict a woman's ability to stretch until she is right there doing it!

    !
    :yeahthat:

  3. #3
    Registered User

    Jan 2010
    1,975

    I think it has more to do with the shape of the pelvis than the size of the woman. I've also read that nature dictates that most women will grow a baby that is of a size their pelvis is capable of birthing. Gotta love Mother Nature... the human body is such an amazing thing!

  4. #4
    Registered User

    Mar 2007
    Melbourne
    4,031

    I thought it was all to do with Pelvis too?

    I am 5ft 2 and 48kg (sz 6) and have vaginally birthed 3 children (no insides falling out).
    My mother is smaller and had 6kids.

    One of my boys was nearly 9lbs

    I looked absolutely huge my last two pregnancy's and people would look at my like
    Sounds like a scare tactic to me without knowing all the facts.

  5. #5
    Registered User

    Jan 2005
    Down by the ocean
    6,110

    Yep I'm sub 50kg most of the time and was a size 7 with my first and had no problems. I know of much larger (framed, I don't mean weight) women that have had problems!

    If a caregiver use the term "Tear her in half" then I'd be telling her to complain! That's awful!

    Perhaps though she has embellished what was said because she felt she had to to justify the reasons why she elected to have a c/sect IYKWIM.

  6. #6

    Feb 2008
    With my awesome cherubs
    2,975

    I'm 5ft and was a size 6 when I had DS and DD1 and both of them were born vaginally with no tearing or anything as already said its all to do with the uterus and pelvis nothing to do with weight/height/size etc

  7. #7
    Registered User

    Nov 2006
    brisbane
    3,975

    Perhaps though she has embellished what was said because she felt she had to to justify the reasons why she elected to have a c/sect IYKWIM
    Thats what I am thinking...plus this is second hand talk too...my brothers GF is friends with her and told me!

    I am just sad that she might have been bullied or scared into it! Make sme want to be a doula/birth educator even more

  8. #8
    Registered User

    Nov 2009
    Scottish expat living in Geelong
    5,572

    It is definitely to do with pelvis and not dress size. My sister has been told the same though and believes it after her first birth resulted in a c-section for maternal exhaustion after a long, posterior, labour. She is soon heading for her 3rd caesarean and will tell anyone who listens that size 4-6 women cannot birth vaginally if their baby is over 7lbs.