Cervical Scar Tissue - a big issue that no-one is talking about

[HotI]

Interesting blog.

thanks

[Floweryfields]

Really interesting!

[Bumperstump Cummerbund]

I shared that on FB last night, after you linked to it. A friend of mine has 2 gorgeous daughters, and both times she had normal home labours but ended up transferring for a csection - she says she cried reading the article, because she's sure the scar tissue was the only problem. Thank you for sharing!

[Me+him+bub]

wow maybe thats why my first labour failed and my 2nd was so long and needed so much intervention and I didn't dilate on my own over 4 days! I have had a D&C for a 13 week loss which was a bit harder for them to do apparently as my cervix is soooo far back and up coz of a retroverted uterus they had to use an extra long speculum! I will remember this next time! could be the answer to why I can't give birth without intervention. very interesting! will ask them next time!

[onthefly]

How interesting! Thanks

[*Ash*]

Very interesting. Thanks for posting.

[Beach Mama]

So interesting, thanks for posting! I started a thread ages ago about this because I wondered if it was the reason I had problems with both DD and labour not progressing, bub not engaging but I got to 9 cms and then stuck. With DS I never went into labour after 14 days post dates other than a few irregular contractions and wondered both times if it had something to do with LLETZ surgery, biopsies, and CIN II and CIN III cells as well as a D&C post m/c I had before I had before DD.