Shannon, I thought your remarks on the article were right on target. I think the author was making the point that many women don't bf, or cut back, because of the perception that it's more convenient to bottle feed....and our society places a high emphasis on personal convenience.
My third baby had to have comp feeds nearly the entire first year because I was very ill after his birth. Having had a taste of both, I think that bottle feeding *initially* seems more convenient...little coaxing to latch on, feed finished relatively quickly, someone else can do it if needed.
However, as the baby grows older, the convenience (to the mother) of breastfeeding becomes more apparent. What psychologists call "contingency response" is very important--you can respond immediately with the breast, formula takes a bit more time. And as Mayaness said, night feeds are a piece of cake when you're breastfeeding. You are out and about more with an older baby, and the planning required for bottle feeds surprised me. Even bringing a bottle that was already made up had its own annoyances.
I think we have become very preoccupied with bending over backwards to acknowledge the necessary exceptions. Yes, there are caesareans that absolutely have to happen. Yes, bottle feeding was a godsend to me when I was lying semiconscious in the intensive care unit. But people take those exceptional cases and decide that their own convenience (for want of a better word) makes them fall into that category too. Every time someone speaks on breastfeeding, you always hear near the beginning, "Of course, a few women will be unable to breastfeed because of...." We end up giving the fact that a FEW can't, far more weight than it needs, rather than focussing on the idea that NEARLY EVERYONE should be able to do it. When you add the fillip of "convenience" on top of that, it's easy to see how the statistics tumble down so quickly.
Bookmarks