Just a bit of a vent.
As anyone who knows me knows, I always planned to breastfeed DD until she self-weaned. Most children, after all, self-wean between the ages of 2 and 5.
So, DD turned 5 2 weeks ago. She still feeds 2-3 times a week (usually in the middle of the night - we co-sleep). But, she sometimes still asks for it during the day. Not often, but sometimes she does ask. I always tell her no these days. I am over it. I don't mind it in bed, but I just don't want to do it anymore at any other time. She is mostly fine with this.
So, now comes the vent - people who say "Breastfeeding beyond 1 or 2 years is solely for the benefit of the mother."Are you friggin kidding me? I have pretty much been over breastfeeding for the last year, but I continue to do it for DD's sake (e.g. she rarely gets sick, but I notice that she gets better faster if I feed her, etc.I know that it is still good for her). For the mother indeed.
Some people really have no clue...





Some people really have no clue...
Reply With Quote

I do feel very guilty, because she wanted it and has persisted this whole pregnancy, even when there was literally one drop in each boob, she wanted not only the milk, but the comfort and security. BF in this pregnancy has been painful and unpleasant, but I still loved doing it for ed and mourn it now. Now my colostrum is in, she pushes me away, shakes her head etc. So she really has been forced in a way. I'm still offering often, and hopefully when my milk comes back in she may remember how to suck (if that's possible?) and enjoy BF again. But I totally get that feeling of being mean!

Bookmarks