thread: Baby Bonus V Maternity Leave

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Moderator

    Oct 2004
    In my Zombie proof fortress.
    6,449

    your employer is not taxing you correctly if he's not taking into account your annual figure. the whole point of ppl being paid by the employer is to make sure your annual income is taken into account! be aware that there is a chance you may end up with a tax bill at tax time due to the taxation rate your employer is using
    Well actually the employee is taxing correctly as per the ATO guidelines. It is up to the Employee to ask for additional tax to be taken out if they are concerned they may owe tax at the end of the year (this applies to anyone dependent on their situation), there is an ATO form for this (Withholding Variation)

    Nothing has come through from the ATO advising of any special tax treatment for PPL (I work for a software developer and we are sent advisories on how we need to change the system to cope with ATO changes). By the sounds of it the PPL should be taxed like a bonus. Chances are though once the whole tax year is taken into account, it probably evens out anyway.

    I am going to have to revisit my PPL processing instructions to advise the payroll officer to discuss the taxation of PPL.

  2. #2
    Registered User

    Aug 2009
    Ipswich, Queensland
    1,418

    I had a friend who took BB because she worked 'too much' to earn any significant amount out of PPL. Her and her husband were only in the annual bracket of $70K combined but because she did so many hours per week up until bub was born (may baby), it meant that she was going to get less for the PPL than she would if she took BB. Worked out really stupid for her. So i'd ring up and talk to someone. I think if you work roughly 5-10hours a week normally that PPL works out great and more money for you. If you earn any more or any less you end up not 'qualifying' for the whole amount.

  3. #3
    Registered User

    Dec 2007
    Hork-Bajir Valley
    5,722

    I had a friend who took BB because she worked 'too much' to earn any significant amount out of PPL. Her and her husband were only in the annual bracket of $70K combined but because she did so many hours per week up until bub was born (may baby), it meant that she was going to get less for the PPL than she would if she took BB. Worked out really stupid for her. So i'd ring up and talk to someone. I think if you work roughly 5-10hours a week normally that PPL works out great and more money for you. If you earn any more or any less you end up not 'qualifying' for the whole amount.
    but the PPL isn't means teasted. its just 4 1/2 ish months on minimal wage isn't it? so your income shouldn't affect it? (unless by the end of the financial year you go up an extra tax bracket)

  4. #4
    Registered User

    Nov 2008
    Melbourne
    2,008

    but the PPL isn't means teasted. its just 4 1/2 ish months on minimal wage isn't it? so your income shouldn't affect it? (unless by the end of the financial year you go up an extra tax bracket)
    Nope, not means tested and your income doesn't affect the pre-tax full amount, that is the same for everyone. Your income determines how much tax you pay on the full amount. If you have to pay a higher tax rate you could be better off with the BB. That is why the time of year that you take it can affect what works best for you - if you are taking it towards the end of the financial year, chances are your total income will be at a higher level because you have already worked (and earned an income for most of the year). If you are taking it earlier in the financial year and don't intend to return to work until much later in that year or the following year, your earnings for the full year will be lower and as a result the amount of tax you pay of the PPL will be lower.

  5. #5
    Registered User

    Jun 2009
    913

    Thanks so much everyone... glad to see I'm not the only one who is confused! BB is looking much simpler right now!

  6. #6
    Registered User

    Dec 2006
    In my own private paradise
    15,272

    sorry to upset - but there are some income tests applied to PPL - can't recall exactly off the top of my head, but your previous financial year income needs to be included on application because there is a limit to who it is is paid for.

  7. #7
    Registered User

    Dec 2007
    Hork-Bajir Valley
    5,722

    sorry to upset - but there are some income tests applied to PPL - can't recall exactly off the top of my head, but your previous financial year income needs to be included on application because there is a limit to who it is is paid for.
    I think I remember reading that, but it was so ridiculously high for us that DH and I would never earn that much in our lives that I ignored it =P

  8. #8
    Registered User

    Dec 2006
    In my own private paradise
    15,272

    yeah it is probably irrelevant to most average joes like us - but there is an income limit so you need to be aware of it