Miss Belly Belly.

As the creator of this site, I would hope that you would use 'legitimate' information to inform the readers of these threads.

The above numbers are rediculous. 55% adverse reactions???? 35% hemorrhaging???? Come on.

For those that would like to read what the actual figures of complications are (not from references from a couple of anti-circ sites) then the systematic review below is quite a good reference. It was published in Feb 2010. And was the result of a huge database search. 1349 published papers were read. 52 of these met the required standard for the study of neonatal circumcison complications.

If you really want to be informed, I recommend reading the entire article as linked below.

Abstract | Complications of circumcision in male neonates, infants and children: a systematic review