Is circumcision proven to reduce the risk of him getting UTI's etc? Unless there was reputable documented evidence proving circumcision was appropriate, there's no way I'd go ahead with it. As for getting both of them done, if you are only getting it done for medical reasons then why get the other one done if he has no medical reason for it? I personally would only get it done after I had done some in depth research that proved that it would be hugely beneficial - not just potentially beneficial iykwim? Good luck with your decision x
IF one had to be done for medical reasons.... i wouldnt get the other done.
while it is more painful later in life, he would be able to choose if he wanted this procedure for himself (and to be like his brother if that's what he wanted)
i hope both boys are happy and healthy on their arrival
good luck talking to the docs xxx
not the same thing but my oldest was circumcised 17 mths ago due to a tight foreskin that was causing major issue with peeing, we talked to the surgeon at the time about the possibility of Luke having the same problem he was 6weeks at the time the paed so not to worry bout Luke if he needs doing we will know by the time he is 3 yrs having seen Jack recover I have no hesitation in saying I would wait, Jack now at 4 1/2 yrs tells us that yes it hurt but it wasn't a painful hurt more uncomfortable, so unless you dr suggest a cirumsion I'd wait and I certainly wouldn't get twin a done just to be the same does that make sense
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks