thread: Disciplining Toddler - where to start?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    BellyBelly Life Subscriber

    Feb 2006
    South Eastern Suburbs, Vic
    6,054

    Leesa, I remember feeding #2 and #1 looking so darn smug because he knew he was untouchable while I fed - so I started getting up with #2 still attached. You should have seen him! Haha. So after awhile his behaviour improved during feeds because he knew I could get up.
    It also helped to bring a book or snacks with me, so if he was looking cheeky during a feed, I could coax him over to sit next to me and read or eat.

  2. #2
    Registered User

    Nov 2008
    NSW Mid North Coast
    681

    In regards to feeding i have heard that it can be helpful to have a box of special things for your DD to play with that only comes out when you feed. It might contain some stickers, a special doll etc. Maybe she can even help to choose some of the items. This way she is feeling like she gets something special at feed times to and it's not just all about the baby getting mummy's attention.

  3. #3
    Registered User

    Feb 2009
    2,031

    I went through this debate with my DH too.. Sadly they are so determined to be right it will take them a couple of mobile phones and digital cameras to learn the very simple fact of - if you don't want it broken, put it up. It doesn't matter what they do and dont understand, it really doesnt. Its dangerous - lock it up. Its expensive and fragile, put it out of reach. Just because they know they shouldnt touch it does not mean they wont - ever.

    Plus - it teaches them what they can't touch in a positive manner. You don't have to yell at them for touching it - they cant. You don't have to smack their hand if they damage it - they cant. But they can't reach it so they know they can't have it. Has worked wonders for us.

    I don't think they ever grow out of touching things they know they arent allowed to. As they get older its less about willful defiance and more about fully believing that mum and dad don't trust them but they know they wont break it - so.... Discaplining about that is just going to be a never ending cycle of frustration and tears which can be spared by just putting it out of reach in the first place - and accepting that the TV is gonna get dirty and maybe a little bit broken. LOL

  4. #4
    Registered User
    Add fionas on Facebook

    Apr 2007
    Recently treechanged to Woodend, VIC
    3,473

    Yep, I too work on the principle that if it's valuable it's the parent's responsibility to keep it out of reach.

    Plus I think some kids are 'better' than others at learning that some things shouldn't be touched. I think some naturally do as they're told and some are slightly more curious. I know mums at MG who say they only had to say no a few times and their child stopped touching. Well, I've said no consistently literally hundreds of times and the only thing it achieved was making me and DD miserable. So I don't think it's always about consistency - it's about the child's nature too.

    So I've chosen to choose my battles, we're a lot happier for it and DD will give stuff back to me when I ask now instead of chucking a tanty.

    She's also very good at knowing that she really can't climb all over me when I'm drinking a cup of tea!

  5. #5
    Registered User

    Apr 2007
    Somewhere here and there.....
    483

    If you really don't want her touching it, put it up out of reach. While she is learning what is ok to play with and what isn't 19 months is still very young. Get your DP to ask his parents if he was any good at not touching at that age. While they look big they are still also in their babyhood at that age.

    Also at the end of the day how often do you want to be telling her don't touch, eventually if you say it too much she will just switch off to you and you will feel like a broken record. And if you have another little person in the house explain to DP that you just don't need the extra work and it's no hassle for him to put his phone higher up really.

  6. #6
    Registered User

    Feb 2009
    2,031

    Yep, I too work on the principle that if it's valuable it's the parent's responsibility to keep it out of reach.
    Exactly. The best way I came up with explaining this to my DH was thusly.

    Go to the shop, park your car, leave it open and the keys in the ignition. People are old enough to know they shouldn't steal it just because its there. Let me know how that works out.

    Gotta take responsibility for your stuff.

  7. #7
    Registered User

    Dec 2005
    Melbourne, Vic
    4,338

    We always tried to move things out of reach, I don't think you can blame a 19 month old for touchinh something interesting if we've left it out.
    We kept our no touching things for things we couldn't really move like the DVD player, tv, that sort thing, last thing you want to be doing is saying no touching all the time cause they will then just not take any notice. So try pick your battles.

    Discipline wise at that age I used to remove her from whatever she was doing and use distraction methods, like we don't play with the tv lets play with this instead, if she kept going back to it then I would move her into a whole other room which she hated and would stop doing it.

  8. #8
    Registered User

    Oct 2006
    Sydney
    4,081

    I agree with Nelle about impulse control - I see it with DD all the time. Yes, they are often old enough to understand, but their brains are still developing and controlling the impulse they have to touch (even when they know they're not supposed to) comes later for some kids.
    Personally, I am regretful of having used the word 'no' so much with DD - it is her favourite word now. I hate hearing it from her so now I sort of understand how it feels for her to hear it so often from me. If I could do it again, I'd make sure there wasn't so much stuff around that I didn't want her to get into. JME. GL finding common ground with your DP - you are right - it is important that you are both on the same page.