We're still open to the idea of maybe having a third baby... but we're no where near ready now. It may turn out over time that we decide we're done but if we do decide to have another then I wonder about the age gap we'll create.
Our two boys are 2 years 8 months apart and at the moment the minimum age gap I'd see us having between #2 and #3 would be about 3.5 years, but maybe more like 4 or 4.5 years.
Do you think it's kind of weird to have two children less than 3 years apart and then 2 children more than 4 years apart? Does the bigger age gap mean that child is kind of the odd one out? I don't know, I kind of realise it probably doesn't matter and it's not a huge difference but it's on my mind and I'd love to hear your experiences and thoughts.




Reply With Quote
) Personally I found it really satisfying to have the larger gap. When the other three were little it was soooo full on and as they got older I was going from preschool to school one after the other, but with DS2, DD2 had already started school and I had a year of no preschool at all until he started last year. I will have had him at home on his own for 3 years by the time he starts school next year and we have had a beautiful time with just the two of us. It's made me appreciate my 'baby' all the more because it's all about him kwim? I can appreciate the 'last time' of everything more - the last day of preschool, last child at home etc.



Bookmarks