thread: What did you find harder - 1 to 2 or 2 to 3?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    May 2008
    Melbourne, Vic
    8,631

    I'm the first out of my friends to even have kids Kim!! My sis only has two and she thinks I'm mad for even contemplating 3!!!

    My new DS has been a dream - it's his big sis who is causing us dramas. I kind of think if we did have a 3rd, DD would love being an actual "big sister" and playing with/looking after DS while I tended to #3. At the moment, she really doesn't get it.

  2. #2
    Registered User

    Jan 2006
    country victoria
    1,055

    Hi Ocean princess,

    As you can see I have 3 boys, my first 2 were 16 months apart and I think that this on its own was quite challenging in its own way. I always knew that I wanted 3 children but for the sake of my marriage and sanity I couldn't do such another close age gap.
    There is nearly 2 1/2 years between my 2nd and 3rd sons which I found worked really well as the older 2 were at an age that they were generally playing together nicely so didn't require as much indvidual attention.
    The thing I have found the hardest going from 2 to 3 is the amount of washing, I just can't seem to keep on top of washing, folding, ironing putting it away etc it seems never ending. Otherwise it has all been good.

  3. #3
    Registered User

    Sep 2010
    8

    I have found its not much different having 1,2 or 3 kids ,mine are 2 yrs apart and it seems to have been much the same each time we have added to the brood that I am contemplating number 4. I love how the 2 older kids can play while I look after bubs and they dob on each other when one is doing something wrong while i am distracted with bubs ,very helpful when dd3 is writing on the walls lol. The biggest change I have noticed from going to 2-3 is the amount of food they consume ,i have never seen a loaf of bread go so quick!
    Last edited by Lulu 2; October 1st, 2010 at 10:00 PM.

  4. #4
    Registered User

    Mar 2007
    Perth, WA
    528

    i found 1 - 2 hard for the first few months but then got used to being organised and that was fine. I found 2 - 3 fine until #3 got mobile and then it became really hard. There is 18 months between my first 2 (boys) and then 2 years between 2 and 3. Both #1 and #3 are very very challenging (#1 not so much now but for first 4 1/2 years he was a nightmare :-) ) so some days i think i should have stayed at 2, but then i wouldn't have my dd who i am so close too so i never actually regret it - just have "if id' stopped at 2 life would be so easy now" moments :-). 3 does bring extra challenges in the whole car thing - having 3 in car seats and finding cars big enough may be an issue. Also being outnumbered by kids meaning someone always has to 'share' mummy or daddy. I think if i knew what i knew now i would still go for 3 as my dd is more than worth it.
    good luck with your decision making - it's such a personal thing only you can decide what's best for you and you will know in your heart what is right.
    x