thread: Oh no! We just got a $2000 electricity bill!

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Registered User

    Jan 2010
    1,975

    I thought they could only estimate one bill per year?
    Nope, they can estimate as many bills as they please. Most providers will do you the 'courtesy' of trying to contact you after 12 continuous months of estimated readings to arrange an actual meter reading. The provider *should* attempt to gain at least one 'actual' reading per year. The onus is on the consumer to check whether the bill is 'actual' or 'estimated' and to contact the supplier should you believe your estimated reading is inaccurate. If you request a 'special' meter reading (ie. not the scheduled reading) in order to clarify whether the estimate is accurate or not, the supplier is entitled to charge you a fee (approx $60 to $100!).

    What's more, if your supplier does underestimate your bill, there is no statute of limitation on how long they can chase you for payment. So if you live in a house for 6 years and don't realise you bills are being underestimated for the entire time you live there... the supplier can rightfully bill you for 6 years of their underestimation!! Apparently, it can and does happen.

    I am in Vic and this information all comes directly from the Energy Ombudsman in my state - I assume other states are the same. As a consumer, it would seem to me that the rules and regulations are heavily stacked in favour of the supplier!! Don't we pay them to provide a service???

  2. #2
    Registered User
    Add Footsteps on Facebook

    Mar 2008
    Waterloo, Merseyside, UK
    2,543

    in the uk suppliers can only go back one year of charging x

  3. #3
    BellyBelly Life Subscriber

    May 2005
    in the national capital
    1,682

    The bill should have the actual meter reading on it (unless they are estimating like others have said). Check this against what your meter is actually reading. I had a similar problem one and it turned out that the meter reader had mixed up the numbers and written an 83 at the start instead of 38 - made quite a difference. Hope that you can get to the bottom of the problem.