I think that was in the ABA magazine a while back? It is an interesting perspective isn't it! Never mind testing on animals - let's just go straight to babies!
Of course it IS important to consider those who have been unable to bf, but I think everyone would agree that babies health should be put before commercial interests. I would suggest that it would have made more sense for health departments or medical professionals to decide what should be fed to babies unable to receive bm -therefore bm alternatives should be "designed" by specialist medical scientists being paid by government or a medical body, not a multinational food corporation, and the manufacturing process should be far more regulated.




Creator of
Reply With Quote


Bookmarks