123

thread: New recommended age for starting solids

  1. #19
    BellyBelly Member

    Jan 2008
    In beautiful chaos!
    2,335

    IMO i believe people wrongly think their babies are ready for food because the watch them eat with interest, they grab at food and cutlery, they stop sleeping as well etc etc.. all of which are very normal developmental leaps, kids watch what we do becasue its how they learn, babies watch us go to the loo, does it mean their ready to toilet train..??
    Very well said

  2. #20
    Registered User

    Nov 2009
    Vic
    1,292

    I think there isn't enough info given to new mothers in the first place. At my mothers group there was a mum who started her bubs on solids as soon as they got home from hossie....scary......

  3. #21
    Registered User

    Jan 2006
    country victoria
    1,055

    Wow straight home from hossie is a bit scary. But it is intersting what people do, my girlfriend (who is a nurse) vitamised up her baby at around 4 months sausages and veg. Must say I thought he was a bit young for meat and 3 veg.

    All my boys have started solids at around 5 months, several different factors but I was comfortable with my decision to start them then. That being said it was a very slow process, rice cereal, small amounts of pumpkin, pear, apple etc. I didn't really start intoducing the wide variety until they were past 6 months.

    I found this way worked for me and my children. As someone else posted every child is different.

  4. #22
    Registered User
    Add UntoldAngel on Facebook

    Nov 2009
    Between concrete walls
    1,885

    I've been told 4 and 6months by two different health nurses within the same clinic!
    Bub will start when he is ready. I've let him gum cooked carrot and a plain biscuit but he wasn't interested in eating, just chomping because it was something in his mouth iykwim...
    Booby milk for this one until he wants something more

  5. #23
    BellyBelly Member

    Jan 2008
    In beautiful chaos!
    2,335

    I think people need to realise also, that starting your child on solids isn't to 'fill' them etc. It's simply a learning process for the child. Learning what food is and that one day this is how they will survive, once weaned.

  6. #24
    Registered User

    Jul 2009
    1,973

    I think people need to realise also, that starting your child on solids isn't to 'fill' them etc. It's simply a learning process for the child. Learning what food is and that one day this is how they will survive, once weaned.
    Good point and well said DM

  7. #25
    Registered User

    Jan 2008
    Just Coasting
    1,794

    IMO i believe people wrongly think their babies are ready for food because the watch them eat with interest, they grab at food and cutlery, they stop sleeping as well etc etc.. all of which are very normal developmental leaps, kids watch what we do becasue its how they learn, babies watch us go to the loo, does it mean they're ready to toilet train..??
    Some people would actually say YES! Sorry Olive, but I couldn't resist (and no offence to those who believe in EC or early TT)

  8. #26
    BellyBelly Life Subscriber

    Jan 2006
    11,633

    I've been hearing about proposed changes in teh guidelines since before DS was born... and still they remain at 6 months. There was apparently a conference for child health nurses some years back hosted by baby food producers pushing 4 months, I think. And of course different professionals have their own opinions. I know of people who've been told by peadiatricians that 3 months is a good age to start. The allergy people are now saying 4-6 months, but the official guidelines have yet to be changed, so far as I know.
    All babies are different, but I can't imagine there are many 3 month olds with sufficiently developed digestive systems to really manage solids. Personally I think if you're having to slip things into bottles or puree stuff to oblivian before sticking it in your baby's mouth then they're probably not really ready for it.

    Anyway, the bottom line is watching your baby and following their lead. Much easier to get it right that way.

  9. #27
    Registered User

    Oct 2007
    Perth,WA
    2,942

    Im so glad to of found this because I was wondering if the 'recommendation' had changed. I'd noticed more and more people are feeding earlier than 6 months, which is what I did with DS. I'm living in the Asian bubble so have no CHN to consult with about this....but I'm sticking with what I know...and thats 6 months.

  10. #28
    BellyBelly Member

    Jan 2008
    In beautiful chaos!
    2,335

    Im worried parents get a little excited and want their bubs to hit a new 'milestone', solids, turning car seat around early etc etc......

    These are babies and need to take the time they need and hit the milestones at their natural rate!

  11. #29
    ♥ BellyBelly's Creator ♥
    Add BellyBelly on Facebook Follow BellyBelly On Twitter

    Feb 2003
    Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, Australia
    8,982

    He recommends 3 months? Or some other peak body? I'm sticking to WHO also.
    Kelly xx

    Creator of BellyBelly.com.au, doula, writer and mother of three amazing children
    Author of Want To Be A Doula? Everything You Need To Know
    In 2015 I went Around The World + Kids!
    Forever grateful to my incredible Mod Team

  12. #30
    Registered User

    Feb 2007
    In the jungle.
    4,809

    another ooops
    Last edited by Junglemum; October 18th, 2010 at 07:41 PM.

  13. #31
    Registered User

    Feb 2007
    In the jungle.
    4,809

    oops......
    Last edited by Junglemum; October 18th, 2010 at 07:40 PM.

  14. #32
    Registered User

    Feb 2007
    In the jungle.
    4,809

    I thought the RCH Melbourne changed their recommendation to something like

    "Solids ok from 4 months, but around 6 months" or something along those lines? I think it is a change from 'definitely not before 6 months'. right?

    Here's a paper from RCH that says 4-6 months but it is more focus on prevention of allergy with a fmaily history. http://www.rch.org.au/emplibrary/kid...of_allergy.pdf

    We've done 6 months for both girls. Not sure what we'll do next time. Probably the same, if the baby is ready.

    When they are able to sit unassisted and don't have a gag reflex is a pretty good indicator for me.

  15. #33
    Registered User

    Nov 2008
    Lake Macquarie, NSW
    131

    I definitely didn't want to start solids until 6 months but after serious weight gain issues & recommendation by a Paediatrician we started DS just over 4 months. He is now 5 months & weight is gaining well despite him only having a small amt of solids once a day and not every day (currently about 1 tbs steamed mashed pumpkin). My dilemma is that he seems to really enjoy it - he opens his mouth wide and eats it all up.

    I know the guidelines are to complement bf after 6 months & a big part of me wants to cut out the solids & do this for the next month but there is another part of me that sees him enjoy eating that makes me want to keep going. I am not replacing any milk feeds just adding it in.

    It is so confusing to know what is right here.

  16. #34
    Registered User
    Add helle on Facebook

    Sep 2008
    Bunbury, Western Australia
    3,963

    It was 6 months when I was a baby, so it's been around for at least 22 years!
    I personally don't think there really is an exact "age" to start... DS has only gotten into his solids the last month, others love it at 4 months or less...

    IMO i believe people wrongly think their babies are ready for food because the watch them eat with interest, they grab at food and cutlery, they stop sleeping as well etc etc.. all of which are very normal developmental leaps, kids watch what we do becasue its how they learn, babies watch us go to the loo, does it mean they're ready to toilet train..??
    totally agree. and i'm not affraid to say that I tried ds on some solids just before he hit six months just because of all those reasons ^^;

  17. #35
    Registered User

    Jun 2010
    763

    I too was told by our GP that the new recommendation is from 4 months. I was really confused by this, so questioned her further as it was 6m when DD was a baby. I will have to follow up further next week when we see her again where she got this information from.

    We started DS at 4m following her advice, but quickly stopped as he really wasn't ready for solids. I have been playing around with them about this last week or so, but i don't feel he is ready yet now either. So confusing. With DD it was easy, DS seems to be a whole new ball game.

  18. #36
    Life Subscriber

    Jul 2006
    Brisbane
    6,683

    Appletree, there was a study done which showed that starting solids between 4 and 6 months MAY reduce the risk of allergies. However this result has been questioned by many medical professionals due to some inconsistencies. Also, there is much evidence that solids before 6 months can cause other problems due to the GI system not being ready - allergies are only one consideration. Unfortunately the baby food manufacturers have jumped on the study and are now funding seminars and training sessions for child health nurses and advising them that solids should be started at 4 months.

    Currently there is a lot of disagreement amongst medical professionals about when solids should be started. The WHO has analysed all the studies that have been done and on the basis of everything known, have decided to stick with the 6 month recommendation. This is the current guideline despite the information some medical professionals are giving out. The only thing that is universally agreed on is that solids should not be given before 4 months.

    When you start solids is a decision only you can make, based on the WHO guidelines, other information and your own instincts and observations of your child. With all the conflicting information it can be a very hard decision. Personally I chose to wait until 6 months for both my boys and I'm glad I did. They are both healthy, allergy free and great eaters.

123