WLAB, first of all, I just have this instant dislike of anyone jumping onto the 'age-related/egg too old' bandwagon too quickly, unless he can produce concrete evidence and have done enough tests to prove that. After all these years TTC and seen a few FS and read quite a lot, I think this is the easiest and most irresponsible way to label a patient that they fail...but that is just my opinon.

If you are a good responser and normally produce lot of eggs, I would tend to go 'steady and slow' approach so they are going slowly and tend to have better qualility. However, I can't recall if your problem is low fert rate. fail to progress to blastocyst or fail to implant etc.

The change of my protocal to antagonist cycle was intended to increase the quality of the eggs, to me, that didn't work well. The long and slow stim cycle have much better result. But again, now we know my problem is immue system related now which affect implantation.

Let me know what the major issue you are trying to overcome, maybe will have better advice.