Parental leave is unpaid.
As Suse said, it is driven by federal legislation. Basically it gives either parent the right to be at home caring for their child/ren without reprisal from their workplace. This applies even to casuals like me! provided there has been 12 months continuous employment at the same company.
(According to legislation) you are entitled to 1 year of unpaid leave, with a further 12 months if agreed by your workplace (in Argon's case it would seem they are ok with this).
The parent who is not taking long parental leave is entitled to one week at the time of birth. They can apply for an extension of short parental leave up to 8 weeks.
- this is what prompted me to look into it - DH's work told him he may not be able to take it - but he is legally entitled to one week.
As for annual leave, it is a separate thing, it is paid leave not unpaid and it forms part of your partners wages/salary... it is between them & their employer when they take it.
If your DH was given annual leave CM, he should still ahve been entitled to 1 week unpaid parental leave - the question is would you want to take it, if you have paid leave banked up, kwim?
My info is from the wageline website, I'm pretty sure it applies federally.
HTH![]()




Reply With Quote
His annual leave began the day I was due, but I went 12 days over. Oh well.



Bookmarks