To have the test or to not have the test?

[Arimeh]

That's basically the same risk groups I read last night Maz, except the age was 35 - not 30. And on that list, I was only at risk because I am overweight - which I've been for the other pregnancies - but I was probably classed as obese with Eden's pregnancy and no GD there....

[Persephone1]

I think (for me) it was really stressful to consider how I might be treated if I was labelled as GD. My SIL, for example, was labelled as GD and then told that her Ob wouldn't "let" her go past 38 weeks because baby was going to be over 4kg. She was induced at 38 weeks and gave birth (via c-section) to a 3.1kg boy. He was smaller than my own DS born at 41 weeks (not that comparisons apply but ykwim). The whole saga made me very disappointed - particularly as a 4kg isn't that big and had my SIL been "allowed" to continue the pregnancy she might have had spontaneous labour and perhaps even avoided a c-section. (PS I don't judge my SIL, it's my issue, not her's).

I also know someone who birthed a 4.8kg baby with no GD diagnosis. For her it was just a case of "big genes" but no doubt she'll be classified as being in a risk category because she's had a previous large baby. Pfft!