thread: Nuchal Blood Test Result - Confused, scared and feeling alone.

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Registered User

    Sep 2007
    Brisbane
    5,729

    Oh gosh hun how stressful this must be . I am sorry that you are "high risk". Remember though that 1 in 40 is only 2.5%... that is a 97.5% chance of everything being fine, which is great odds!

    I can't believe they booked you in for an amnio without asking O.o wow!

    Thinking of you xoxo

  2. #2
    Registered User

    Dec 2005
    In Bankworld with Barbara
    14,222

    OH Nae hunny I'm sure that everything is fine with your bubba and the result doesn't mean that there is a problem I like Maruschke's stats too

    Don't be afraid to come in here for support if you feel you cant get it IRL OK?

  3. #3
    Registered User

    Feb 2006
    Australia
    1,092

    Crumbs! So sorry, it's 1:140 not 1:40.... Typo :-(

    Thanx for your replies so far ladies, just reading your posts is comforting beyond words, I appreciate it so much ...why didn't I do this a week ago?

    Thank you thank you x what would I do without bellybelly?

  4. #4
    Registered User

    Jan 2006
    country victoria
    1,055

    I good family friend was in a similar situation, it was her 3rd child, she was only 27 and came back with a high risk after the nuechal fold test. (Sorry I don't know which bit put her in the high category) Anyway she and her husband mad the decision not to have the amnio and she went through the pregnancy not knowing. (Very strong of her I don't think I could have done that) long story short she had a beautiful healthy little boy who was perfect in everyway.

    I too think that they shouldn't have booked you an amnio without discussing it with you first.

    I'm sure everything is fine too.

  5. #5
    Registered User

    Sep 2007
    Brisbane
    5,729

    Oh Renee, that's even better! I know you feel down about it, but 1 in 140 is a 99.29% chance of a healthy baby. I'm sorry they have stressed you out about this *hugs*. You aren't alone in this journey.

  6. #6
    Registered User

    Sep 2008
    Sydney
    1,413

    I know it is so scary, I have been where you are, they didnt even bother doing the bloods as high nuchal fluid was picked up at 9 weeks so not even the proper scan. We chose the CVS testing as could be done earlier than the amnio as the wait was excruiating. We also paid more to get the FISH (quick results). I was low risk as was only 25, no family history etc etc. Can you see a geneticist and/or genetic counsellor? We saw one who was very good at explaining and talking through all of our fears etc.

    Best wishes xxx

  7. #7
    Registered User

    Sep 2008
    Sydney
    1,413

    Forgot to add, after such a stressful pregnancy and lots of ultrasounds and tests, our DD was born healthy and happy!

  8. #8
    Registered User

    Feb 2006
    Australia
    1,092

    Just got a information brochure on amniocentesis (published by the gov of WA) they give a 1:100 chance of miscarriage. So I have a higher chance of having a miscarriage from the proceedure than having a baby with DS. That's a frightening statistic but from everything I've been reading on the Internet, including the stories I have been reading on bellybelly the risk everyone else has been given is 1:200? Very confused.

  9. #9
    Registered User

    Oct 2007
    Middle Victoria
    8,924

    are you sure that wasn't the risk for CVS? The risks are usually stated as 1/100 for CVS and 1/200 for amnio.

  10. #10
    Registered User

    Sep 2007
    Brisbane
    5,729

    I thought the risk depended on the skill of the person doing the amnio?

  11. #11
    Registered User
    Add EsJay on Facebook

    Jan 2009
    Hunter Valley
    609

    i agree with Hoti, everything ive read says 1/200, but also as maruschke says it also depends on the skill of the person performing it.
    If you get someone who hasnt done many i would say the risk would be much higher, whereas someone like the lady i seen who does 7-10 procedures a week for the last 15 years or so i would believe to have a lower risk.
    Unless WA gov have chosen to give a different statistic