... 234

thread: 2 lines but very far apart

  1. #55
    Registered User

    Mar 2008
    North Northcote
    8,065

    hmm that is a strange one...

    i reckon you are totally in with a chance of BFP based on that though

  2. #56
    Registered User

    Apr 2011
    Sydney
    272

    zee - hard to see from pic but it looks promising. do another one in the morning with FMU. maybe a first response will give a better result. (quiet woo hoo).

  3. #57
    Registered User
    Follow Oaktree On Twitter

    Mar 2010
    Gold Coast - QLD
    192

    Whats a FMU? I did a FR & got a negative

  4. #58
    Registered User

    Oct 2007
    Middle Victoria
    8,924

    fmu = first morning urine (first wee of the day)

  5. #59
    Registered User
    Follow Oaktree On Twitter

    Mar 2010
    Gold Coast - QLD
    192

    All of my tests have been FMU however I may have went to the toilet during the night or early morning before I did my sunrise wee wee does that make a difference?

  6. #60
    Registered User

    Nov 2009
    Scottish expat living in Geelong
    5,572

    yeah that might make a difference. You want the most concentrated urine which has been sitting in the bladder for ages which is why they say first morning urine. Can you try and hold it in overnight?

  7. #61
    BellyBelly Member

    Oct 2008
    3,132

    Zee that test is just plain cruel.

    I loved this website when I had my POAS obsession and I looked it up for you. The news isn't good unfortunately but this might explain it ... POAS ~ HPT FAQ Question 26 is the one you're after...

  8. #62
    Registered User
    Follow Oaktree On Twitter

    Mar 2010
    Gold Coast - QLD
    192

    Yeah I think it was a neg otherwise I would have got a BFP on a FR

  9. #63
    Registered User
    Add Khaleesi on Facebook

    Feb 2007
    Wonderland
    5,383

    That would explain it, but i still have everything crossed for you

  10. #64
    Registered User

    Feb 2008
    Country Victoria
    5,945

    How strange does that test look! It is really far apart.. Im still stumped..

  11. #65
    Registered User
    Follow Oaktree On Twitter

    Mar 2010
    Gold Coast - QLD
    192

    Well thanks for all of your replies Ladies! Yes it was confusing but obviously not reliable test so I am counting this as a BFN. If you want to follow me I am in the TTC 1-6 months thread
    x

  12. #66
    Registered User

    Feb 2010
    Newcastle
    1,151

    Zee that looks like my internet cheapies and they never picked up on me bein pregnant this time until i had missed my period they say they can detect 10ml but really didnt detect mine until i was 38

    maybe wait a couple days and redest if your still abit worried

  13. #67
    Registered User
    Add NaeNae on Facebook

    Sep 2007
    South Gippsland
    3,753

    Hey sweets, just weighing in on this. Its not a +ve test based on where the second line is HOWEVER, it looks to me like there is a blip just on the top where the second line should be. Dunno if it was a dirty mark or a dent on the stick.

    I think this test has failed and if AF still hasn't shown up definately go and buy a Clear Blue Digital test or a First response test.

    They will give you a real indication of whats happening unless your still too early ITMS.

    Good luck
    Nae x

  14. #68
    Registered User
    Follow Oaktree On Twitter

    Mar 2010
    Gold Coast - QLD
    192

    = Negative

    AF came today so it was a neg.

  15. #69
    Registered User
    Add NaeNae on Facebook

    Sep 2007
    South Gippsland
    3,753

    oh bugger

  16. #70
    Registered User

    Apr 2009
    Sydney
    2,350

    Bummer dude

... 234