thread: Dating scans - Urgent help please

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Registered User

    Feb 2007
    In the jungle.
    4,809

    Technically the earlier scan would be more accurate. However, we are talking fractions of mm making a difference of a day or so. And 8 weeks is still early enough to have an accurate dating scan.

    I too would argue that you were given a later date at an 8 week scan, which is still an accurate time to date a pregnancy, and you would feel more comfortable going by that date rather than your earlier one.

    Good luck.

  2. #2
    Registered User

    Nov 2007
    Gold Coast, Australia
    397

    Thanks everyone!!!!

    Mitch, its a pain in the bum why they want to do a c section. But basically, because I fell pregnant 11 months after i had an emergency c section with #1DS i have not waited long enough for my scar to heal ebough for a vbac, so my risk of uterine rupture increases. Do not worry, i am very well educated about this now, and i know its safe to say that its a crock.

    So am i right in beleiving that I have the choice about when the due date is taken as? If i dont want to use the 7th then its my choice?

    Sorry to sound a bit silly, but i went into spontanious labour with my first, and never had to really be concerned about "due dates"

  3. #3
    Registered User

    Jul 2007
    melb
    8,498

    so u were preg 11 months after but by time baby comes your first child will be nearly 2 years old is that right??

    If that is it the are screwing u over!! argue point of it means a lot to you to have a VBAC if u r happy with cs dont stress then but do ask to use later date.

  4. #4
    Registered User

    May 2005
    Good ole NZ !!
    1,870

    I had a c/sect with Alexa & was told to wait 6 months before getting pregnant again ( not that things have planed out that way LOL)... after 11 months things should be well & truly healed.... surely

  5. #5
    Registered User

    Dec 2005
    In Bankworld with Barbara
    14,222

    I would definately be telling them to go by the later date - it is only a couple of days later and if there is no urgent reason why baby has to be out earlier, then he is better off in than out.

  6. #6
    Registered User

    Nov 2007
    Gold Coast, Australia
    397

    Just an update, they are going by the later date

    it was a very interesting appointment to say the least, i am updating in the C/S section of the forum.

  7. #7
    Registered User

    Jan 2007
    7,197

    Yay Mummatotwo!!!!
    Just to let you know - it definately is a crock! My births will be 16.5 mths apart so I fell pregnant only 7-8 mths after my c/s and my hospital is happy for me to attempt my VBAC. There is a "slightly" increased risk if you are attempting a VBAC prior to an 18 mth gap due to letting the scar heal (I fall short by 1.5 mths!) but the increased risk in almost all cases is not enough to warrant a repeat c/s. HtH.

  8. #8
    Registered User

    Nov 2007
    Gold Coast, Australia
    397

    Yep thats my other big news, i walked in there and the first thing they said to me was, "so do youwant to trial a vbac?"